Conclusions
All of the students in our ThinkQuest group, agreed that we should try to "can spam." We thought that we could definitely change spam for everyone.
Once we got further into our study, we knew that filters have been invented, but the average email account didn't have the filter. We also knew that the government is trying to outlaw spams, but the first amendment of the constitution (Freedom of Speech) stands in it's path. We also knew that advertisers sent spams because it is usually free, or very little cost.
Since spams are for free, or cheap, we think they should have a substantial cost. That should limit the amount of spam people receive- because most advertisers won't want to pay that price. Though, the negative thing is that some advertisers might loose their job. We also think that the public should have more rights to fight against spam. Through our survey almost everyone hated it. There should be more laws that let people speak for what they believe in- GETTING RID OF SPAM!
All in all, we hope that the people who read this are right with us- and they should stand up for what they believe in.