English Gardens
he 18th century provided the conditions for a completely different course in the development of garden design. The new style decides against straight lines and stiff geometrical composition and in favor of a more natural construction of parks and gardens. The 20s were the time of breaking centuries old geometric traditions in Twickenham, Chiswick and Stowe. 

“The idea of English landscape gardens doesn’t fall behind the intellectual, art-oriented standards of the Italian and French in any respect. On the contrary, it surpasses them many times over because it only accepts that which has generality.” T.O. Enge

The revolutionary garden design had, in spite of its freed forms, some obligatory rules. First of all, it’s the rejection of all main or lateral axes dividing the garden area into distinct sections. The right angle was frowned upon since “nature abhors the straight line” which William Kent, one of the founders of this new style, was convinced in. this was the triumph of the serpentine, the “line of beauty”. However, “If the serpentine is declared the obligatory line in the garden, its winding nature makes it no less enforced or determined than the straight line or right angle. Mathematical necessity is just as applicable here as to more conventional forms. By the beginning of the 18th century, mathematics had already advanced far beyond Euclidean geometry. Differential and integral calculus, in other words the calculation of irregular curves and areas, were the order of the day. The serpentine is strikingly similar to the fall of a classic differential curve with its maximum and minimum. From this point of view, the English landscape garden can be seen as a tribute to the mathematics of the age.” 

Water was no longer regarded as a “shaped fluid.” What is more, waterworks were forbidden along with any possible flights of stairs, ramps, terraces and supporting walls. Apart from the naturally flowing stream only one other form of water was permitted: the broad lake with irregular shores. The parterres de broderies were replaced by uniform, borderless lawns, sometimes reaching up to the very house. Since there were no clear boundaries in the form of hedges, fences or any kind of walls, no higher or lower levels in essence (i.e. all places were equally present, equally inviting, gentle and lively), there was no need for any process of mediation between them. 

Everything in the park was planned in such a way that it was absolutely impossible to view the whole area as an entity. The importance of generality to the English garden is also clear in its treatment of he solitary tree as a closed unit, a reflection of universal wholeness. "Each individual thing, with its carefully-staged solitude pointing to universal relationships of nature, becomes a window onto a world theatre containing an infinite number of stages next to, above and below each other. On each of these stages even the smallest object can tell its individual cosmic story.”

1716 brought to the world one of the best English landscape architects – Lancelot Brown or “Capability” Brown as everybody called him. He was of the opinion that the architect ought to seek the “capabilities” inherent in the landscape, that his work could merely be defined as “improvement” and that built architecture should be avoided as far as possible. Brown had a “rival”, William Chambers who designed Kew Gardens and who placed great value on spiritual elements. Chambers was one of the idealists who dotted the landscape with meaningful pieces of architecture. Brown, on the contrary, belonged to the naturalists. It is often claimed that the classic English landscape garden contains no architecture, only nature. But this point of view forgets that even nature is the work of an architect: “nature” is that which art selects, retains and develops as nature. The English landscape garden was, in fact, no less a precisely calculated artificial world than were the French and Italian gardens. It was a network of curves laid out over a strict straight lined coordinate system. The results showed that the two harmonize excellently: the English landscape gardens have enjoyed wide popularity right up to the present day. 




Pre-Modern Styles
Noted publications, persons
and events in the history of 
agriculture and gardening 
including related information 
from botany, ecology, biology,
and natural history.

Compiled and provided by Michael Garofalo
Timeline opens in a new window
Click here if unable to open timeline
 


1800 - 1880 Pre-Modern Styles
   1750 - 1880 Neo-Classicism
   1800 - 1880 Romanticism
   1830's - 1870 Realism
   1848 - 1854 Pre-Raphaelites
   1870's - 1890's Impressionism
.

 House in a Garden 
Picasso, Pablo. 
Oil on canvas. 73.6x60.5 cm; France. 1908 
State Museum of New Western Art, Moscow. 1930


 Memory of the Garden at Etten (Ladies of Arles)
Gogh, Vincent van. 
Oil on canvas. 73x92 cm; France. 1888 
State Museum of New Western Art, Moscow. 1948


Ancient World > The Garden of Eden | Mesopotamia | Egypt | Greece | Rome
Middle Ages > Middle Europe | Moors' Garden Art | Gothic Style
Renaissance > Italian Renaissance | French Renaissance
Baroque > Italian Baroque | French Classicism | Rococo
Pre-Modern Styles > English Landscape Gardens | Gothic Revival | American Gardens
Non-Western Styles > Near East and India | China | Japan