|
Mr Mudakuma
Lukallimka's reply:
I passed
on this question to a friend of mine, who is both a qualified astronomer
and an experienced student of cuneiform, Dr. Mathieu OSSENDRIJVER.
Today I got
his response, which reads:
"Concerning
possible alignment of ziqqurats:
It appears
that, unlike Egyptian pyramids, mesopotamian temples and ziqqurats(temple
towers) were not systematically aligned to any direction. This is what
a brief look at a random sample of maps of temple complexes suggests to
me.
However, I'm not aware of any systematic study of this phenomenon in Mesopotamia
for all periods, so I am not able to make a definite statement.
Concerning
the 'star of Ishtar':
Ishtar is
the name of an important Babylonian goddess associated with love and war.
Her astral representative is the planet Venus, which is therefore sometimes
simply called Ishtar, among other names, such as Dilbat, Inanna or Ninsianna.
The cuneiform signs which are used to write
Ishtar consist of the determinative MUL, which signifies that the word
is the name of a star or a planet, plus the name of the deity. Thus, very
likely, the element MUL is not to be
translated, as was sometimes done in old translations ('star of Ishtar').
It is commonly
believed that the deity Ishtar is of semitic (i.e. akkadian) origin, but
in Babylonia the semitic Ishtar was equated with the sumerian goddess
Inanna, who had similar functions, already at a very early date in the
third millennium. Thus it is difficult to identify which characteristics
of Ishtar were adopted from Inanna and which ones may be attributed to
the heritage of the Akkadians.
From a comparison
of Akkadian and Sumerian texts mentioning Ishtar or Inanna,it appears
that 1)Inanna has always been a female deity, and 2) that she was originally
identified mainly with Venus as an evening star. Both aspects are frequently
attested in sumerian religious texts from southern Mesopotamia (Uruk,
Nippur). The deity Ishtar however appears to have been a male deity originally,
as is shown by texts from places in Syria and northern Mesopotamia such
as Ebla, which are thought to have been less influenced by Sumerian culture.
He was associated mainly with Venus as a morning star. As such, Ishtar
was sometimes depicted wearing a beard, even as late as under the reign
of the Assyrian king Assurbanipal.
This should not be seen as evidence that the Assyrian or Babylonian Ishtar
was of two sexes. Rather, the Babylonians and Assyrians had come to consider
Ishtar as being a female very early already, through the merging with
the Sumerian Inanna.
Furthermore, there is no evidence for the presence of a male Ishtar in
any Babylonian or Assyrian temple: all the Ishtar deities in temples appear
to have been female. But one aspect of the original Ishtar was not completely
forgotten, namely
that in its astronomical function as the morning star, Ishtar is in fact
male. It must be pointed out, though, that the Babylonians and Assyrians
were themselves rather confused by this, so that they would sometimes
call Venus as an evening star the male Ishtar, and Venus as a morning
star the female Ishtar.
Venus/Ishtar
played an important role in babylonian astrology, and five tablets of
the astrological omen series, Enuma Anu Enlil, (from about 1100 BC onwards)
are devoted to Venus. In fact, out of the planetary omens the Venus omens
form the largest group, even exceeding Jupiter (2 tablets). In these omens,
Venus is referred to as Ninsianna, Dilbat or Ishtar.
Concerning
the importance of astronomy and astrology for the Babylonians:
This is a
complex question that would require a long answer since one must distinguish
between different periods, and because many aspects are unclear. Certainly
the stars played a very important role for all ancient Mesopotamian peoples
throughout all periods, much more so than for the Egyptians. Thus already
the Sumerians (2500-2000 BC) believed that many of their main gods had
astral representations, such as Utu (the Sun), Nanna (the Moon), Inanna
(Venus). There is no evidence however that the Sumerians had any sophisticated
astronomical knowledge about the motion of the planets, although they
may have been aware of schematic periods for the appearance and disappearance
of Venus for instance.
Also, we do not have astrological omina written by the Sumerians.
It seems
that the emergence of the semitic Akkadians brought with it an increased
interest in astrology. Thus from the Old Babylonian time onwards (1850
BC) we have astrological
omens written in Akkadian (Babylonian), often precursors of what later
(1100 BC) becomes the big omen series Enuma Anu Enlil. This series remained
widely copied and used until the very end of the ancient Mesopotamian
civilisation. It shows that at least in this period, the study of celestial
phenomena were an important method of gaining information about the will
and action of the gods. As such it stands besides other methods such as
studying the liver of sheep, although the application of omen astrology
seems to have been somewhat restricted to the king and his palace as compared
to liver omens.
Only very
late, from the Persian time onwards (450 BC) do we find horoscopic astrology
in Mesopotamia, which is rather like the later Greek and western types
of astrology that are still used today. The goal of these horoscopes was
to predict the future of newborns based on the position of the planets
at birth.
Astronomy
as a natural science developed also rather late (from about 800 BC onwards)
but separately from astrology.
Originally its motivation was probably partly astrological and calendaric.
A full mathematical
theory which is able to accurately predict the motion of the planets and
of the Moon exists finally in the Seleucid and Parthian periods (300 BC-100
AD). The dominant theme of these theories is the calculation of the time
and position of the new moon, which signalled the beginning of a new month.
However, similar mathematical theories were succesfully applied to the
planets. The motivation for constructing these theories is not really
known - it may have been simple scientific curiosity, since they appear
to have no astrological use."
|