|
|
"These books...have flushed out academics from their ivory towers in droves to confront the challenges that we put before them". The following reviews are on books that are highly controversial. We suggest buying them if you are interested to read them for yourself. ---
by Zechariah Setchin In these books, Sitchin claims that Baalbek and Sinai peninsula were spaceports of Gods. Pyramids were designed for directioning of spaceships as for precise measurements of the planet, forming his arguments after studying ancient texts such as the Epic of Gilgamesh.If we trust Sitchen's translation abilities (and he did master the Sumarian language), we must be prepared for the imminent return of an alien race who created us some 3,600 years ago. He researched the material for the Earth Chronicles for over 30 years before he picked up a pen to begin writing, and his books are overflowing with specific references to evidence supporting his arguments.
Taken From
Kirkus Reviews:
Hancock argues in all his books that at around the end of the last Ice Age - earlier than 12,000 years ago -it is possible that a culturally advanced maritime civilisation flourished around the globe, primarily inhabiting protected coastlines close to the oceans. The main argument in this book is that numerous ancient sites and monuments (the pyramids of Mexico and Egypt, the ruins of Angkor Wat in Cambodia, the monuments of Yonaguni in the Pacific, and the megaliths of Peru and Bolivia) are situated in such a way, geodetically, that they point towards some separate and uniform influence, some lost civilization or "invisible college" of astronomer-priests. And that civilization, as evidenced in the mathematics and architecture of the sites, points towards some gnosis, or body of knowledge, that would allow humanity to transcend the trap of mortality, a worldview in which the knowledge-giving serpent of Eden is not a villain but a hero.
In this account of historical and archaeological investigation, the authors argue that the Sphinx, the Pyramids, and the other monuments at Giza are of far more ancient origin than previously believed. Complete with details of a conspiracy between the Egyptology establishment and various confidential organizations to keep the secrets of the Pyramids from the world. The book also claimes that the Sphinx goes back in history even further than the oldest proposed dates of the Pyramids at Giza. Through computer animation, the Sphinx has been shown to point directly at the Leo star constellation as far back a 10,500BC. They attribute signs of erosion on the Sphinx to great flood before 8000BC and state geological evidence for it. --- So, what do Egyptologists have to say about these theories?
-MARK LEHNER, Archaeologist, Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, and Harvard Semitic Museum. Quoted from a PBS NOVA Interview with him. You can comment on Book Reviews in the Forum. |