|
Equivalence
Priciple
The
newly discovered relativity of space and time was very important in Einstein's
desire to understand gravity. Einstein found Newton's description of gravity
disappointing, because it assumes that space and time are absolute. However,
gravity causes a falling object to accelerate and, according to the special
theory of relativity, the resulting motion also affects rulers and clocks
that are moving with the moving object. Thus, Einstein argued that gravity
must affect the shape of space and the flow of time.
To explain how gravity
can behave in this way, Einstein began by demonstrating that it is not
necessary to think of gravity as a force. According to Newton's theory,
an apple falls to the floor because of the force of gravity pulls the
apple down. Einstein pointed out that the apple would appear to behave
in exactly the same way in space, far from the Earth's gravity, if the
floor were to accelerate upwards. In other words, the floor comes up to
meet the apple.

In the figure(shown
on the right), the famous two gentlemen are watching an apple fall towards
the floor of their compartments. They have no way of telling who is at
rest on the Earth and who is in the hypothetical elevator moving upward
at a constantly increasing speed. This is an example of Einstein's principle
of equivalence, which states that in a small volume of space, the downward
pull of gravity can be accurately and completely duplicated by an upward
acceleration of the observer. The principal of equivalence allowed Einstein
to focus entirely on motion, rather than force, in discussing gravity.
Far from a source of gravity, a falling body has only a small acceleration,
so the effect on clocks and rulers moving with the body is small. Nearer
a source of gravity, the falling body has a larger acceleration, so the
distortion of clocks and rulers is larger as well. In this way, Einstein
"generalized" his special theory to arrive at his general theory
of relativity, published in 1915.
Back to Top
Curvature
of Space
A hallmark of gravity
is that is causes the same acceleration no matter what the mass of the
object. For example, a baseball and a cannon ball have very different
masses, but if you drop them side-by-side, they accelerate downward at
exactly the same rate. To explain this, Einstein envisioned gravity as
being caused by a curvature of space. In fact, his general theory of relativity
describes gravity entirely in terms of the geometry of both space and
time. Far from a source of gravity, like a planet or a star, space is
"flat" and clocks tick at their normal rate. Closer to a source
of gravity, however, clocks slow down and space is curved. A useful analogy
is to imagine that the space near a massive object such as the Sun becomes
curved like a surface in figure.
Imagine
a ball rolling along this surface. Far from the "well" that
represents the Sun, the ball would move in straight line since the surface
is fairly flat. If it passes the well, however, it would curve in toward
the well. If it is moving at an appropriate speed with respect to the
well, it might move in an orbit aroundthe sides of the well.In this analogy,it
is the curvatureof the surface that makes
the ball follow a curved path near the well. The curvature has the same
effect on a ball of any size, which explains why gravity produces the
same acceleration on objects of different mass.
Back to Top
Orbit
Precession
One of the first
things Einstein did with his new theory was to calculate the orbits of
the planets. Einstein realized that if his theory was correct, it should
be able to predict accurately the well-known motions of the planets about
the Sun. According to general relativity, space far from the Sun is almost
flat and objects thus travel along nearly straight-line paths. Near the
Sun, planets and comets travel along curved paths because space itself
is curved. Einstein found that where gravity is weak, the general theory
of relativity gives exactly the same results as the classical theory of
Newton. But in stronger gravity, such as is found very near the Sun's
surface, the general theory of relativity predicts that there will be
noticeable effects upon space and time, and the Newtonian theory of gravity
is no longer accurate.
Even before Einstein,
scientists knew that the motions of the planets closest to the Sun do
not agree with Newtonian mechanics. During the mid-1800s, French astronomer
Urbain Le Verrier (famous for his prediction of a planet beyond Uranus)
pointed out that Mercury was not following its predicted orbit. As the
planet moves along its elliptical orbit, the orbit itself rotates or processes.
As
shown in Figure, the long (major) axis of Mercury's orbit slowly changes
orientation. (Somewhat confusing, the term precession is also used to
describe how the axis of rotation of a top or a planet changes direction.
Most of the Mercury's precession is caused by the gravitational pull
of the other planets, as explained by Newtonian mechanics. But once the
effects of all the other planets had been accounted for, there remained
an unexplained excess rotation of Mercury's major axis of 43 arcsec per
century. Although this discrepancy may seem small, it frustrated astronomers
for half a century. Some astronomers even searched for a missing planet
even closer to the Sun that might be tugging on Mercury; none has ever
been found. But Einstein showed that his theory could account for the
excess precession of Mercury's orbit. It was a spectacular confirmation
of his general theory of relativity.
Back to Top
Deflection
of light
To help validate
his theory, Einstein made other predictions that could be tested. With
his calculations he showed that light rays passing near the surface of
the Sun should appear to be deflected from their straight-line paths because
the space through which they are moving is curved. In other words, gravity
would bend light rays, an effect not predicted by Newtonian mechanics
because light has no mass.

Figure above shows a beam of light from a star passing by the Sun and
continuing on to the Earth. Because the light ray is bent, the star appears
to be shifted from its actual location. The largest deflection (a mere
1.75 arcsec) occurs for light rays grazing the Sun's surface.
This prediction was first tested in 1919 during a total solar eclipse.
During the precious moments of totality, when the Moon blocked out the
blinding solar disk, astronomers succeeded in photographing the stars
around the Sun. Careful measurements afterward revealed that the stars
were shifted from their usual positions by an amount consistent with Einstein's
theory. General relativity had passed another important test.
Back to Top
Redshift
Einstein also made
a third prediction. Stated that because gravity causes time to slow down,
clocks on the ground floor of a building would tick more slowly than clocks
on the top floor, which are farther from the Earth (Figure a). A light
wave can be thought of as a clock; just as a clock makes a steady number
of ticks per minute, an observer sees a steady number of complete cycles
of light wave passing by each second. Hence, if a light beam is aimed
from the ground floor to the top floor of a building, an observer at the
top floor will measure the light to have a lower frequency, and thus a
longer wavelength, than an observer on the ground floor (Figure b). Because
an increase in wavelength is a red shift, this effect is called the gravitational
red shift.
The
American physicists Robert Pound and Glen Rebka first measured this effect
in 1960 using gamma rays fired between the top and bottom of a shaft 20
meters tall. Because the Earth's gravity is relatively weak, they measured
only a very small red shift (INSERT FORMULA), but this value was in complete
agreement with Einstein's prediction Much larger gravitational red shifts
are seen in the spectra of white dwarfs, whose spectral lines are red
shifted as light climbs out of the white dwarf's intense surface gravity.
As an example, the gravitational red shift of the spectral lines of the
white dwarf Sirius B is (INSERT FORMULA), which again agrees with the
general theory of relativity.
Be careful not to confuse the gravitational red shift with a Doppler shift.
In the Doppler effect, red shifts are caused by a light source moving
away from an observer. Gravitational red shifts, by contrast, are caused
by time flowing at different rates at different locations. No motion is
involved.
Back to Top | Back
to Homepage
|
|