The Christianity and the empire

The basic new of Jesus´ rules what was brought from the Christian missionaries through all the Roman empire was the expectation from a general-human world desaster by the end of time. It´s law-court concerned all people, the deads and living. It´s picture of the Saviour showed the man sent to world, God´s son and at the same time Son of Man whose law-court means the end of time and a total new world. So that makes clear why Jesus was so much against the religion of law and scholars of the priests and rabbis. That is to say that they lived in the belief that the people would be promised evernal salvation if they only would keep the moral laws, the right and the rules of the downright cult.
  The gospel of Jesus Christ directs out from the field of earthly, i.d. social and politic hopes of salvation. This is the power what gave the Christianity duration over all time. But from the beginning brought this power an insoluble conflict with the politic and the social might of time. So it had to collide with the Roman empire cult and it´s tendency to adoration, had to disappoint the Jewish hopes of the politic liberator and Saviour and couldn´t even work binding and preserving in the state. The big drama of the Middle Age, the dispute between the pontificate and the regents has here it´s roots.
  In the year 313 Constantin finished the period of conflicts. He tried to put the Christianity into the Roman state. But already at the beginning showed the tensions among the imperial-worldly and the spiritual-episcopal authority what was later presented more and more by the pontificate. But the emperor felt as the highest authority in all matters of church when he convoked the imperial council to preserve the unity of the church in precepts and administration. Important got the bishop-council of Nicäa in 325 where the guiding principle was overruled that Jesus would be only similar in charakter to God. The new one was by Athanasius: God and Jesus are identical in charakter. Nevertheless the Aryan direction continued living in the East, especially the German tribes which had changed to the Christianity. The quarrels finished finally after an Aryanic setback under Constantinius (335) and the try of a heathenish resoration under Julian Apostata (361 - 363) in favour of the Athanasianism. In the year 391 the Christianity became the official religio.
  In the Christian church the Roman technology of administration survived the fall of the empire. If the politic differences between Rome and Constantinopel had found it´s spiritual-confessional equivalent the Christianity could be the unity power. The Roman pontificate stepped in front of the East Roman patriarchate. The background were their two different rules of Christ´s character: the divine and the earthly like Rome teached and the one from the anture of God from Constantinopel. The council of Chalcedon didn´t secceed to bridge over this contrasts. Pope Leo the Great (410 - 461) who published the Roman claim of direction protested again the there declared equality of rights of the popes from Constantinopel and Rome.
  This interior disunion was the reason why it was later easy for Justinian I to build an absolute regency of the emperor over the church. That is why he is called the first representative "Caesaropapism", a system in which the worldly and the spititual power were united in one hand. This was first realized in the East of the empire, later iin Russia and the newer Balcan-States.
Comment on this text
Used literature:
Dr. phil. Bleicken, Jochen et altera, 1963: Propyläen-Weltgeschichte - Rom. Die römische Welt. Propyläen Verlag, Berlin, Frankfurt, Wien.

Liberati, Anna Maria und Bourbon, Fabio 1996: Rom. Weltreich der Antike. Nebel Verlag, Erlangen. English original title: Ancient Rome.

Mommsen, Theodor 1953: Römische Geschichte. Buchclub EX LIBIRS, Zürich.