|
Franklin
Roosevelt: Philosophy
Franklin
Delano Roosevelt entered his first term in a time of uncertainty:
the Great Depression. During his first term, all political concerns
were focused on domestic issues. Foreign policy for FDR was
secondary. "... even after Roosevelt was safely in office he
cautiously skirted foreign policy shoals on which he feared his
political popularity and his domestic program might be wrecked."
(Burns 247). Luckily for Roosevelt the crucial decisions in foreign
policy came later. But before the war, his policies were often times
confusing and contradictory.
Lacking
a general principle by which to make foreign policy, Roosevelt
improvised from one situation to another. "Roosevelt, an
ebullient leader who used charm to maintain his aloofness, was an
ambiguous combination of political manipulator and visionary. He
governed more often by instinct than be analysis, and evoked strongly
contrasting emotions." (Kissinger 401). The result was a
jumble of separate and clashing policies. The President ranged back
and forth from the old political internationalism of the Democratic
Party to the economic nationalism implicit in the New Deal, from the
anti-imperialism of the Bryan Democrats to traditional power
politics. (Burns 249)
Roosevelt's
foreign policy philosophy consisted of making sure that his domestic
programs and New Deal agencies passed Congress. In his first two
terms the economy picked up, and Roosevelt could finally enter the
global ring -- just as the war in Europe borke out.
Roosevelt
did take one philosophical stand during his years in office that he
never strayed from. Roosevelt was firmly under the belief that a
lasting peace had to come not just from diplomacy but must involve
the industrialization of backward nations; he simply could not
understand how the Allies could fight a war against tyranny and
fascism and not work for the freedom of people throughout the world
involved in Europe's colonial policies. (Burns 401). While Europe has
been at peace for decades now, the ignorance of this kind of foreign
diplomacy has led to many of the modern conflicts that under
Roosevelt's practice could have been avoided, mainly in former
European colonies.
However
visionary or manipulating Roosevelt was, he was still unable to
recognize the aspirations of other powers. "'I may say that I
got along fine with Marshal Stalin,' [Roosevelt] told the people in
the Christmas Eve 1943 fireside chat, '... and I believe that we are
going to get along very well with him and the Russian people-very
well indeed.'" (4 464). This ironic statement proves how
underestimating Roosevelt could be, and although his philosophy
regarding colonies was sound, his foreign policies as a whole were
improvised and thus less effective than they could have been. |