Dr. Scott Sandford, NASA astrochemist,
co-investigator of the STARDUST Mission, a member of Ames Astrophysics
Branch and co-leader of NASA Ames Astrochemistry Laboratory:
| |
 |
|
| |
|
Dr.
Scott Sandford, posing with an astrophysical environment simulation
chamber. Courtesy Dr. Sandford. |
|
|
"People shouldnt feel like they have to get a degree in astrobiology
or astrochemistry. For example, over the years our lab has been extremely
productive and a lot of fun for everyone involved and has discovered all
kinds of things. Weve done that by having a diverse group of people
with a variety of backgrounds and expertises. Our group has had astronomers,
physicists, biochemists, physical chemists - in other words, you dont
need a degree in astrochemistry to do astrochemistry. In fact, my experience
has been that people who focus their learning on a particular sub-area
tend not to have broad enough experience and scientific background to
tackle new problems as they come along. You need good expertise in a relevant
field, but it doesnt necessarily have to be the field you think
you want to work in. Everyone doing astrobiology right now comes to it
from a variety of backgrounds - Im not sure I know anyone who has
a degree in astrobiology.
Chemistry, physics, math and geology are all great backgrounds if you
want to go into space science. Having a good understanding of spectroscopy
is important. We will never get a sample of most of the interstellar medium,
we can only look at it from afar, and for this reason it is important
that you are capable of analyzing that type of material from afar.
The main thing students need to do is to learn how to learn. Researchers
have to learn and teach themselvesall the time. Astrochemistry isnt
astronomy, or physics, or chemistry - there are very few books or people
concentrating on the subject exclusively. You must be able to keep an
open mind and be able to accumulate new facts and techniques and expertises
as you need them.
Also, to be a good scientist today you really have to have good communication
skills. Some people go into science because they hate english, but the
fact of the matter is that you cant be a decent scientist without
being able to read, write and speak well. What good is it to discover
something if you cant write a proper paper to explain it to everyone
else? Once you are a scientist, nobody walks up to you and says Heres
a pot of money, go discover something!. The way the American system
works is you have to write a proposal where you tell people what you want
to do, the reasons why you want to do it, what you expect to learn, what
it would cost, and why the science is worth the cost. Then you have to
convince a review panel to grant you the funding. So if you cant
write and argue well, you wont get any money, and you wont
do any science. That is why the ability to communicate effectively is
essential if you want to be a scientist."
Read the full interview with Dr. Scott
Sandford, covering his role on the NASA STARDUST comet sample return mission
and how the mission relates to our understanding of the origins of life.
Dr. Farid Salama, NASA astrochemist and
co-leader of the Astrochemistry Laboratory of Ames Space Science Division.
| |
 |
|
| |
|
Dr. Farid Salama, using
a liquid helium cooled cryostat in his astrochemistry lab. Photo
courtesy Dr. Farid Salama.
|
|
|
"Aspiring astrochemists and astrophysicists need to be highly motivated
researchers who are curious, unafraid to explore unknown territories and
who are very open to new ideas.
Besides, in terms of studies, the needs are a strong background in either
physical chemistry, chemistry or physics and a good knowledge of astrophysics
or astronomy.
Personally, I wanted primarily to understand how the universe works and
to follow a rigorous and precise path towards this understanding by using
scientific arguments. I also like that it is a multi-disciplinary work.
You work with people from various backgrounds (chemists, physicists, astronomers,
geophysicists, geochemists, etc...) so you're always learning something
new.
It's a challenging task because you are usually dealing with issues that
would not occur on Earth under the normal conditions of temperature and
pressure. You need to simulate these conditions with a laboratory experiment
and/or with calculations and that is not an easy task. One the greatest
rewards of this field of study is that you are always pushing the boundaries
of scientific knowledge because you have to answer unusual questions (unusual
compared to our familiar environment on earth). The field is still "young"
and is continuously expanding. With time, we are learning more about space
and we need to learn more about space for the future of human space exploration."
Read the full interview with Dr. Farid
Salama about the possibility of life in outer space and exactly what polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are.