|
The Static War
On June 23 1951 Jacob Malik, the USSR delegate to the
United Nations, announced in New York during a broadcast of the
U.N. radio program, "The Price of Peace," that the USSR
believed the war in Korea could be settled. "Discussions,"
he said, "should be started between the belligerents for a
cease fire and an armistice...." When Communist China endorsed
Malik's proposal over Peiping radio, President Truman authorized
General Ridgway to arrange armistice talks with his enemy counterpart.
Through an exchange of radio messages both sides agreed to open
negotiations on July 10 at the town of Kaesong, in territory which
was then no-man's-land in the west but which would become a neutral
area. At the first armistice conference the two delegations agreed
that hostilities would continue until an armistice agreement was
signed. Except for brief, violent episodes, however, action along
the front would never regain the momentum of the first year. By
July 26 the two armistice delegations fixed the points to be settled
in order to achieve an armistice. But then the enemy delegates began
to delay negotiations, to gain time, it seemed, in which to strengthen
their military forces, and thus also to strengthen their bargaining
position. In any case, the enemy delegation continued to delay and
finally broke off negotiations on August 22. General Van Fleet,
at that juncture, opened limited-objective attacks. In east-central
Korea, he sent forces toward terrain objectives five to seven miles
above Line Kansas-among them places named the Punchbowl, Bloody
Ridge, and Heartbreak Ridge-to drive enemy forces from positions
that favored an attack on Line Kansas. These objectives were won
by the last week of October. In the west, Van Fleet's forces struck
northwest on a forty-mile front to secure a new line three to four
miles beyond the Wyoming line in order to protect important supply
roads that lay only a short distance behind the existing western
front. The new line was reached by October 12. These successes may
have had an influence on the enemy, who agreed to return to the
armistice conference table. Negotiations resumed on October 25,
this time at Panmunjom, a tiny settlement seven miles southeast
of Kaesong. Hope for an early armistice grew on November 27 when
the two delegations agreed that a line of demarcation during an
armistice would be the existing line of contact provided an armistice
agreement was reached within thirty days. Hence, while both sides
awaited the outcome of negotiations, fighting during the remainder
of 1951 tapered off to patrol clashes, raids, and small battles
for possession of outposts in no-man's-land. The first tactical
use of helicopters by U.S. forces occurred about this time when
almost a thousand marines were lifted to a front-line position and
a like number returned to the rear. Discord over several issues,
including the exchange of prisoners of war, prevented an armistice
agreement within the stipulated thirty days. The
prisoner of war quarrel heightened in January 1952 after UNC delegates
proposed to give captives a choice in repatriation proceedings,
maintaining that those prisoners who did not wish to return to their
homelands could be simply "set at liberty" according to
the Geneva Conventions of 1949. The enemy representatives protested
vigorously. While argument continued, both sides tacitly extended
the November 27 provisions for a line of demarcation. This had the
effect of holding battle action to the pattern of the thirty-day
waiting period. By May 1952 the two delegations were completely
deadlocked on the repatriation issue. On the 7th of that month inmates
of UNC Prison Camp No. 1 on Koje-do, an island of the southern coast,
on orders smuggled to them from North Korea managed to entice the
U.S. camp commander to a compound gate, drag him inside, and keep
him captive. The strategy, which became clear in subsequent prisoner
demands, was to trade the U.S. officer's life and release for UNC
admissions of inhumane treatment of captives, including alleged
cruelties during previous screenings of prisoners in which a large
number of prisoners refused repatriation. The obvious objective
was to discredit the voluntary repatriation stand taken by the UNC
delegation at Panmunjom. Although a new camp commander obtained
his predecessor's release, in the process he signed a damaging statement
including an admission that "...there have been instances of
bloodshed where many prisoners of war have been killed and wounded
by U.N. Forces." There was no change in the UNC stand on repatriation
but the statement was widely exploited by the Communists at Panmunjom
and elsewhere for its propaganda value. Amid the
Koje-do trouble, General Ridgway received transfer orders placing
him in command of NATO forces in Europe. General Mark W. Clark became
the new commander in the Far East, with one less responsibility
than MacArthur and Ridgway had carried. On April 28 a peace treaty
with Japan had gone into effect, restoring Japan's sovereignty and
thus ending the occupation. Faced immediately with the Koje-do affair,
General Clark had the impression of walking "... into something
that felt remarkably like a swinging door...." He immediately
repudiated the prison camp commander's statement. Moving swiftly,
he placed Brig. Gen. Haydon L. Boatner in charge of the camp with
instructions to move the prisoners into smaller, more manageable
compounds and to institute other measures that would eliminate the
likelihood of another uprising. General Boatner completed the task
on June 10. While argument over repatriation went on at Panmunjom,
action at the front continued as a series of artillery duels, patrols,
ambushes, raids, and bitter contests for outpost positions. But
for all the furious and costly small-scale battles that took place,
the lines remained substantially unchanged at the end of 1952. The
armistice conference meanwhile went into an indefinite recess in
October with the repatriation issue still unresolved. In
November, the American people elected a Republican President. Dwight
D. Eisenhower. An issue in the campaign had been the war in Korea,
over which there was a growing popular discontent, in particular
with the lack of progress toward an armistice. In a campaign pledge
to "go to Korea, Eisenhower implied that if elected he
would attempt to end the war quickly. Consequently, when the President-elect
in early December fulfilled his promise to visit Korea, there was
indeed some expectation of a dramatic change in the conduct of the
war. General Clark went so far as to prepare detailed estimates
of measures necessary to obtain a military victory. But it quickly
became clear that Eisenhower, like President Truman, preferred to
seek an honorable armistice. As he would write later, however, the
President-elect did decide to let Communist authorities know that
if satisfactory progress toward an armistice was not forthcoming,
"...we intended to move decisively without inhibition in our
use of weapons, and would no longer be responsible for confining
hostilities to the Korean peninsula." Immediately after taking
office, President Eisenhower made sure this word reached Moscow,
Peiping, and P'yongyang. In the hope of prompting
a resumption of armistice negotiations, General Clark in February
1953 proposed to his enemy counterpart that the two sides exchange
sick and wounded prisoners. But there was no response and no break
in the deadlock at Panmunjom by spring. At the front, where in February
Lt. Gen. Maxwell D. Taylor had replaced General Van Fleet as the
Eighth Army commander, the battle action continued in the mold of
the previous year. The break finally came near the end of March,
about three weeks after the death of Josef Stalin, when enemy armistice
delegates not only replied favorably to General Clark's proposal
that sick and wounded captives be exchanged but also suggested that
this exchange perhaps could "... lead to the smooth settlement
of the entire question of prisoners of war." With that, the
armistice conference resumed in April. An exchange of sick and wounded
prisoners was carried out that same month; and before the middle
of June, the prisoner repatriation problem was settled through agreement
that each side would have an opportunity to persuade those captives
refusing return to their homelands to change their minds. The
pace of battle quickened in May when Chinese forces launched regimental
attacks against outposts guarding approaches to the Eighth Army's
main line in the west. A large battle flared on June 10 when three
Chinese divisions penetrated two miles through a South Korean position
in central Korea before being contained. That engagement could have
been the last of the war since the terms of an armistice by then
were all but complete. But on June 18 ROK President Rhee, who from
the beginning had objected to any armistice that left Korea divided,
ordered the release of North Korean prisoners who had refused repatriation.
Within a few days most of these North Korean captives "brokeout"
of prison camp and disappeared among a cooperative South Korean
populace. Since the captives had been guarded by South Korean troops,
UNC officials disclaimed responsibility for the break, but the enemy
armistice delegates denounced the action as a serious breach of
faith. It took more than a month to repair the damage done by Rhee's
order. Enemy forces used this delay to wrest more ground from UNC
control, attacking on July 13 and driving a wedge eight miles deep
in the Eighth Army's central sector. General Taylor deployed units
to contain the shoulders and point of the wedge then counterattacked.
But he halted his attack force on July 20 short of the original
line since by that date the armistice delegations had come to a
new accord and needed only to work out a few small details. Taylor's
order to halt ended the last major battle of the war. After
a week of dealing with administrative matters, each chief delegate
signed the military armistice agreement at Panmunjom at 10:00 a.m.
on July 27. General Clark and the enemy commanders later affixed
their signatures at their respective headquarters. As stipulated
in the agreement, all fighting stopped twelve hours after the first
signing, at 10:00 p.m., July 27, 1953. When the final casualty report
for the thirty-seven months of fighting was prepared, total UNC
casualties reached over 550,000, including almost 95,000 dead. U.S.
losses numbered 142,091, of whom 33,629 were killed, 103,284 wounded,
and 5,178 missing or captured. U.S. Army casualties alone totaled
27,704 dead, 77,596 wounded, and 4,658 missing or captured. The
hulk of these casualties occurred during the first year of the fighting.
The estimate of enemy casualties, including prisoners, exceeded
1,500,000, of which 900,000, almost two-thirds, were Chinese.
|