Most human beings wonder at one stage or another about the meaning of the creation. We want to make sense of what we see around us and ask : What is the nature of the universe ? What is our place in it and where did it and we come from ? Why is it the way it is ? Where are we going ?
To try to answer these questions we adopt some "world picture". Just as an infinite tower of tortoises supporting the flat earth is such a picture , so is the theory of superstrings. Both are theories of the universe , the latter is much more mathematical and precise than the former. Both theories lack observational evidence : no one has ever seen a giant tortoise with the earth on its back , but then , no one has ever seen a superstring either. However , the tortoise theory fails to be a good scientific theory because it predicts that people should be able to fall of the edge of the world. To the best of our knowledge , this has never happened before , unless that turns out to be the explanation for that people who are supposed to have disappeared in the Bermuda Triangle.
The earliest theoretical attempts to describe and explain the universe involved the idea that events and natural phenomena were controlled by spirits with human emotions who acted in a very humanlike and unpredictable manner. These spirits inhabited natural objects , like rivers and mountains , including celestial bodies , like the sun and moon. They had to be placated and their favours sought in order to ensure the fertility of the soil and the rotation of the seasons , excavations of ancient communities are richly endowed with evidence of the power "gods" had. Gradually , however , it must have been noticed that there were certain regularities : the sun always rose in the east and set in the west , whether or not a sacrifice had been made to the sun god. Further , the sun , the moon , and the planets followed precise paths across the sky that could be predicted in advance with considerable accuracy. The sun and the moon might still be gods , but they were gods who obeyed strict laws , apparently without any exceptions , if one discounts stories like that of the sun stopping for Joshua.
At first , these regularities and laws were obvious only in astronomy and a few other situations. However as civilisation developed , and particularly in the last 300 years , more and more regularities and laws were discovered. The success of these laws led Laplace at the beginning of the nineteenth - century to postulate scientific determinism , that is , he suggested that there would be a set of laws that would determine the evolution of the universe precisely , given its configuration at one time.
Laplace's determinism was incomplete in two ways. It did not say how the laws should be chosen and it did not specify the initial configuration of the universe. These were left to God. God would choose how the universe began and what laws it obeyed , but he would not intervene in the universe once it had started. In affect , God was confined to the areas that nineteenth - century science did not understand.
We now know that Leplace's hopes of determinism cannot be realised , at least the terms he had in mind. The uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics implies that certain pairs of quantities , such as the position and velocity of a particle , cannot both be predicted with complete accuracy.
Quantum mechanics deals with this situation via a class of quantum theories in which particles don't have well - defined positions and velocities , but are represented by a wave. These quantum theories are deterministic in the sense that they give laws for the evolution of the wave with time. Thus if one knows the wave at one time , one can calculate it at any other time. The unpredictable , random elements comes in only when we try to interpret the wave in terms of position and velocity of particles. But maybe that is our mistake : maybe there are no particle positions and velocities , only waves. It is just that we try to fit the waves to our preconceived ideas of position and velocities. The resulting mismatch is the cause of the apparent unpredictability.
In affect , we have redefined the task of science to be the discovery of laws that will enable us to predict events up to the limits set by the uncertainty principle. The question remains however : How or why were the laws and the initial state of the universe chosen.
According to the general theory of relativity , there must have been a state of infinite density in the past , the big bang , which would have an effective beginning of time. Similarly , if the whole universe recollapsed , there must be another state of infinite density in the future , the big crunch which would be an end of time. Even if the whole universe did not recollapsed , there would be singularities in any localised regions that collapsed to form black holes. These singularities would be an end of time for anyone who fell into the black hole. At the big bang and other singularities , all the laws would have been broken down , so God would still have had complete freedom to choose what happened and how the universe began.
When we combine quantum mechanics with general relativity , there seems to be a new possibility that did not arise before : that space and time together might form a finite , four dimensional space without singularities or boundaries , like the surface of the earth , but with more dimensions. It seems that this idea could explain many of the observed features of the universe , such as its large - scale uniformity and also the smaller scale departures from homogeneity , like galaxies , stars , and even human beings. It could even account for the arrow of time that we observe. But if the universe is completely self - contained , with no singularities or boundaries , and completely described by a unified theory , that has profound implications for the role of God as the Creator.
Einstein once asked the question : "How much choice did God have in constructing the universe" If the no boundary proposal is correct , He had no freedom at all to choose initial conditions. He would , of course , still have had the freedom to choose the laws the universe obeyed. This , however , may not really have been all that much of a choice ; there may well only be one , or a small number , of complete unified theories , such as the heterotic string theory , that are self consistent and allow the existence of structures as complicated as human beings , who can investigate the laws of the universe and ask about the nature of God.
Even if there is only one possible unified theory , it is just a set of rules and equations. What is it that breathes fire into the equation and makes a universe for them to describe ? The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the questions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existence ? Is the unified theory so compelling that it brings about its own existence ? Or does it need a creator , and, if so , does He have any other effect on the universe ? And who created Him ?
Up to now most scientists have been to occupied with the development of new theories that describe what the universe is , to as the question why ? On the other hand the people whose business it is to ask why , the philosophers , have not been able to keep up with the advance of scientific theories. In the eighteenth century , philosophers considered the whole of human knowledge , including science , to be their field and discussed questions such as : Did the universe have a beginning ? However , in the nineteenth - and twentieth centuries , science became too technical and mathematical for the philosophers , or anyone else except a few specialists. Philosophers reduced the scope of their inquiries so much that Wittgenstein , the most famous philosopher of the century said : " The sole remaining task for philosophy is the analysis of language." What a comedown from the great tradition of philosophy from Aristotle to Kant !!
However , if we do discover a complete theory , it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone , not just a few scientists. Then we shall all , philosophers , scientists , and just ordinary people , be able to take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and the universe exits. If we find the answer to that , it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason - for then we would know the mind of God.