|
|
 Because of the unwieldiness of direct democracies in areas with medium or large
populations, the closest practicable model of a direct democracy is the Participatory
model. In this model, citizens play an active role in the government through neighborhood
assemblies and workers councils. Supporters of this theory say that citizens would
be less apathetic towards government if they were given more chances to participate;
apathy is not inherent in human nature. To achieve this, supporters call for the reform of
political, social, and economic institutions. Participatory Democrats feel that citizens
should have a voice not only in government but also in corporations, unions, schools,
churches and other institutions that have a direct impact on their lives. Participatory
theorists note that the lack of opportunities for citizens to voice their opinions in the
workplace, the school, and other institutions prevent citizens from influencing the
decisions that shape their lives. Also, theorists believe citizens cannot be expected to
participate well in government if they are subject to authoritative rule in other areas of
their lives. Groups such as Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and the Student
Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) have espoused various forms of participatory
democracies. Citizen involvement is the focus of the Participatory model (Lewis). |