[an error occurred while processing this directive] SLR Photography Online

SLR Photography Online
Tip: [an error occurred while processing this directive]

Home
What's a SLR?
Beginner's Guide
Technique
Projects
Discussion
Links
Glossary
Contact Us

Join our Mailing List!
Enter your email below:


 

Quicktime

Discussion

To F-1 or Not to F-1?, or, "Are we having F-1 yet?"

FOLLOW-UPS
POST FOLLOW-UP
Posted by John Sanderson on March 28, 2002 at 12:38:05:
I'm weary of automated features and want to go back to
fully manual slr. A friend and I visited a
professionally reputable camera store recently and
looked at a Canon F-1 body. I am able to get what looks
to be good price (compared with prices asked for the
scant F-1's I've located elsewhere). This 'war horse'
is heavy, but I'm imaging it's also a fine example of
mass-produced craftsmanship of the kind Japan (and
other countries) will not see again. I've also heard,
though, that the F-1 light meter is not always
accurate. (That's a generic comment, not specifically
about the one I was looking at.) Here are a couple of
queries for all you photo wizards, assuming I buy the
F-1, plus a 50mm lens and a 35mm lens.

1 How should I test the camera to verify it reads
exposures correctly, at given shutter speeds and f-
stops?
2 The camera is obviously used. How can I guage it's
mechanical reliability? How many more 'snaps' will it
go before it is beyond repair at a reasonable price?
3 Oh, and by the way, can a camera this old still be
repaired at a reasonable price?
4 And, finally, am I foolish to spend more on the F-1
when a later-model Nikon, for example, could produce
equally good or better results? And what later-model
unit would you recommend, and why?

Thanks.
John.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup:

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:

Your Message:


Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

FOLLOW-UPS
POST FOLLOW-UP
[an error occurred while processing this directive]