Totally Tessellated: To Main Page
History and Culture of TessellationsEssentialsA Simple Type of TessellationM. C. Escher and His Unique Approach to TessellationsBeyond the Basics of Tessellations
Toolbar
Regular Tessellations (2/4)
 

1. Introduction
2.
Trial and Error
3.
Analysis of Results
4.
Naming the Regular
Tessellations

5.
The Regular
Tessellations
6. Hands-On Activities
Analysis of Results
Now that we have tried some preliminary examples, what can we conclude? Can we predict, without actually trying, which regular polygons will tessellate by themselves? Of the regular polygons that we tried, which ones tessellated? What is distinct about these regular polygons that allows them to tessellate?

We discovered that the equilateral triangle, square, and regular hexagon each have the common ability to fill the space around a vertex perfectly, whereas other regular polygons cannot. Therefore, it is likely true that regular polygons that can perfectly fill the space around a vertex will be able to tessellate.

Notice that since each interior angle of a equilateral triangle has 60°, six of these complete a full circle rotation of 360°. Similar, each interior angle of a square has 90°, so four of these complete 360°. Finally, each interior angle of a regular hexagon has 120°, so three of these will complete 360°.

Regular Tessellations Fill the 360 Degrees Around a Vertex

In each case, the interior angles add up to exactly 360 degrees

 

Following is a table summarizing these results. An example from the table is as follows: Suppose the number of sides of a regular polygon is 6. Then, the number of degrees in the interior angle is 180(6-2)/6 which equals 120. (See Regular Polygons if you are confused.) The number of polygons need to fill 360 degrees is 360 divided by 120 which is 3. Thus, the numbers 6, 120, and 3 appear in the table below.

number of sides
interior angle
number of polygons
needed to fill 360°
3
60
360/60 = 6
4
90
360/90 = 4
5
108
360/108 = 3.333
6
120
360/120 = 3
7
128 4/7
360/(128 4/7) = 2.8
8
135
360/135 = 2.667
9
140
360/140 = 2.571
10
144
360/144 = 2.5
11
150
360/150 = 2.4
...
...
...
n
180(n-2)/n
360/(180(n-2)/n) = 2n/(n-2)

Only 3, 4, and 6 perfectly fill 360°

In the last column, you see that some of the numbers have decimals, which represent "parts" of polygons needed to fill 360 degrees; since "parts" of polygons are not useful in tessellations, those polygons other than the 3-, 4-, and 6-sided triangle, square, and hexagon cannot tessellate. But do any regular polygons with more than 11 sides tessellate?

As you can see, the number of polygons needed to fill 360 degrees decreases as the number of sides increases. So, as the number of sides increases past 11, the number of polygons needed will fall below 2.4. The next integer below 2.4 is 2. But having only two polygons around a vertex means both polygons have 180 degree angles (straight lines). Since there are no polygons having a straight angle (180°), we can see that 3, 4, and 6 are the only numbers of sides that work.

In other words, equilateral triangles, squares, and regular hexagons are the only regular polygons that will tessellate by themselves.

Up

Real examples of regular tessellations:


TemplatesTo browse full-page templates of the regular tessellations that are ready to be printed, proceed to the templates page:

top of the page