The Retrial of Clarence Norris

To recapitulate: the first Scottsboro trial took place in March 1931; the United States Supreme Court ordered new trials in 1932; the second round of trials took place in the spring of 1933; judge Horton ordered new trials in the summer of that same year. Thus, in winter of 1933 a third round of trials began. A new judge, William W. Callahan, presided; because in the fall of 1933, shortly after Judge Horton's call for a new trial, Horton was defeated at the polls.

In June Judge Horton had argued that no one should be convicted on the circumstantial evidence and the uncorroborated charge of one witness alone. However, Judge Callahan opened the December trial with a charge to the jury in which he proclaimed a legal interpretation opposite to Judge Horton's:

The law would authorize conviction on the testimony of Victoria Price alone, if, from that evidence, taken into consideration with all the other evidence in the case, both for the State and for the defendant, convinced you beyond a reasonable doubt that she had been ravished. The law does not require corroboration.

Indeed, judge Callahan was far less receptive than Judge Horton to the case put forward by the defense; he was far less amenable to scrutinizing Victoria Price's character and reliability.

Within a week of the beginning of the third round of trials, Haywood Patterson was found guilty for a third time and Clarence Norris was tried and found guilty. The following document from the third round of trials comes from the court transcript of Norris's trial in December 1933. It includes part of the testimony of Victoria Price and a deposition taken from Ruby Bates. Of interest here are continued inconsistencies in Price's testimony; the continued frustration of the defense attorney (note, for example, early in the testimony in this excerpt that information is presented in an unorthodox way, through questions and not answers); and the attribution of motives to Price by Ruby Bates, who had reversed her testimony in the previous spring of 1933.

FROM THE TESTIMONY OF VICTORIA PRICE AND THE DEPOSITION OF RUBY BATES IN THE RETRIAL OF CLARENCE NORRIS, DECEMBER 2, 1933

Cross-Examination by Mr. Leibowitz

A My true name is not Mrs. Price. I am not Mrs. Price; my husband's name is not Price. My last husband's name is McClendon. His first name is Enna. I was married to Mr. McClendon in Huntsville, Alabama. I don't know how long it was before this rape that I was married to Mr. McClendon; I had been married to him over a year or two. I did not assume the name of McClendon. I never went by my husband's name. I had another husband, too. His name was Henry Presley. I married him in Fayetteville, Tennessee. I don't know exactly how long before I married my second husband I married my first husband. It was a couple of years. I wouldn't be positive. I was married by a justice. I cannot give you the date of that marriage. I did not have any other husband besides those two. I did not ever use the name of Presley, my first husband's name.

Q Who did you start out to Chattanooga with the day before-I withdraw that-you ever been convicted of a crime?

MR. KNIGHT: We object to that.

THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: I haven't finished my question.

THE COURT: It sounded like it to me.

Q Weren't you convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude-Look this way please, not over that way!

THE COURT: Now Mr. Leibowitz, don't proceed along that line any more.

Q Were you ever convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, under

the name of Victoria Presley, in the year 1927?

MR. KNIGHT: I object to that.

THE COURT: I doubt whether this witness knows what moral turpitude is; I doubt whether half the lawyers know it or not.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: That is on the question of credibility.

THE COURT: Ask if she has been convicted and I can then determine whether that involves moral turpitude.

Q What were you convicted of?

MR. ]KNIGHT: We object to that.

THE COURT: I sustain the objection.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Your Honor just told me to ask it.

THE COURT: No, not that way-you misunderstood me.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: May I have an answer to my previous question?

THE COURT: I sustained the objection to both of them.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Exception.

THE COURT: You can ask her if she has ever been convicted of a certain offense, and I can then determine whether you can ask that kind of question.

Q Were you ever convicted of the crime of adultery?

MR. KNIGHT: We object to that.

THE COURT: I sustain the objection. (To the jury) Gentlemen of the jury, when a question is asked and I sustain an objection to that question, that question and aU that involves and all inferences from it, is out of the case, and not evidence in the case, and you must not consider it in arriving at your verdict.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Exception.

Q Were you ever convicted of the crime of fornication?

MR. KNIGHT: We object to that.

THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Exception.

Q Were you ever convicted for a violation of the prohibition law?

MR. KNIGHT: We object to that.

THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Exception.

Q Were you ever convicted of vagrancy and drunkenness?

MR. KNIGHT: We object to that.

THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Exception.

Q Were you ever convicted of any crime under the name of Victoria Presley?

MR. KNIGHT: We object to that.

THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Exception.

A I wasn't working on March 24, 1931; neither was Ruby Bates. I did not leave my home town which is Huntsville, on March 24, 1931, with a man named Lester Carter.

[Lester Carter is brought in.]

Q Did you meet a man named Gilley at the trial?

MR. KNIGHT: We object to that.

THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Exception.

AI know Gilley.

Q Where was the first place you claim that you met Gilley, on the train when you were coming back-had you ever seen Gilley before that time?

A Not as I remember.

Q Not that you know of?

A No sir.

Q You hadn't spoken to Gilley in Chattanooga, had you?

A I probably had and didn't know who he was.

Q Mrs. Price, did you speak to any person in Chattanooga, just "yes" or "no," please?

MR.KNIGHT: We object to that.

THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Exception.

Q Did Gilley bring you some food in Chattanooga?

A Yes sir.

MR. IMGHT: We object to that.

THE COURT: I sustain the objection. Gentlemen, she made answer to the question. That is excluded because I had held that the question is illegal.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Exception.

Q I will ask you, Mrs. Price, where you spent the night in-

MR. KNIGHT: I object to that.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: I am not going to continue this examination if I am to be interrupted.

THE COURT: You are going on with the examination, and I am not going to allow you to be interrupted. Wait until you are certain that he is through with his question, Mr. Attorney General, before you make any objection.

Q I am going to ask you, Mrs. Price, if you spent the night in Chattanooga in a wooded section near the railroad yards?

THE COURT: I see that you have gone far enough with it, myself, to make that question illegal, and I sustain the objection to it.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: We except.

Q I must ask just one more question; don't answer it until objection is made and ruled on by the Court. Did you, there that night, in and about the railroad yards in Chattanooga, have sexual intercourse with one Lester Carter, or one Gilley, in company with Ruby Bates?

MR.KNIGHT: We object to that.

THECOURT: I sustain the objection. Mr. Leibowitz, that question was so palpably illegal that you ought not to have asked a question like that.

MR.LEIBOWITZ: I except to the admonition of the Court and move for a mistrial.

THE COURT: The motion is overruled.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Your Honor sustained the objection to the question? THE COURT: Yes, sir.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Exception.

Q May I ask this question: Isn't it a fact that you and Lester Carter were together in the very same jail in Huntsville?

MR. KNIGHT: We object to that.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: On the question of credibility, your Honor.

THE COURT: I sustain the objection.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: Exception.

A Before I got down on the chert, I was hit in the head with a gun. They hit me between my eye and the top of my head; hit me along there (indicating). I wouldn't be positive where they hit me. It bled a little bit. it didn't make my head swollen there. Well, it did, a little bit.

I don't know the make of any gun. I don't know what caliber means. I don't know a .38 from a .45. 1 didn't ever know anything about the caliber of any guns at any time in my life. All I know is that he had the barrel in his hand and hit me with the other end. The barrel is the end the smoke comes from.

Q Where did you find that out?

THE COURT: I don't see any use in taking up time with that. I would imagine that anyone with common sense would know which was the barrel of a pistol.

MR. LEIBOWITZ: I want to except to the Court's statement in reference to the cross-examination.

A He hit me with the . I don't know which is the ; I reckon the handle is the butt. The handle is the end, I know that. I don't know which way the pistol was when he hit me. I probably might have told you the other day that it was the end of the gun; I don't know anything about it. Whichever part he hit me with, he hit me on the head between the eyebrow and the top of the head, right along here (indicating) somewhere. When he hit me, some blood came out, a little bit. I was standing up when he hit me. He didn't hit me; he didn't knock me down. He hit me. They was all shuffling around me there. After the man hit me with the end of the pistol, which caused a wound on my head that bled a little, I don't know whether he punched me or not; I don't remember.

Q Way back in Scottsboro you knew something about the caliber of guns, didn't you, "Yes" or "No," didn't you?

AI just had been told what they called guns.

Q You knew all about the caliber of guns in Scottsboro, didn't you?

A No sir.

Q Let's see; the very first trial you testified in, in Scottsboro hardly a week or ten days after this supposed rape, do you remember testifying before Judge Hawkins?

A Yes sir, before judge Hawkins, I did.

Q Do you remember being asked these questions and making these answers:

"That one yonder, Charley Weems? A. Yes sir. Q. With a gun or pistol? A. A pistol, a .45."

THE COURT: Do you remember whether you said that or not?

A I probably did, judge, your Honor.

Q Now, in the Patterson case, I will ask you if you were not asked this question, and make these answers: "Q. What did you see this defendant do in that fight? A. I seen him knock a boy in the head. Q What with? A. A gun. Q. A pistol? A. A .38." Did you say that?

A I don't know whether I did or not; I don't remember.

Q Were you not asked these questions and made these answers in the Powell, Robertson, Wright, Montgomery, and Williams case: "Q. Did you see the two men who carried the guns? A. Sure. Q. They were both there? A. There was two that had guns absolutely, a .38 and a .45." Did you say that?

A I don't remember whether I did or not.

Q If you said it, was it a fact?

A I don't know the make of a gun.

Q You don't know a .38 from a .50?

A To the best of my judgment that is what I called them. I heard them called that. I don't know what they was.

I don't know how many men punched me in the face- I didn't count them. I don't know whether there was more than two or not. Sure, they punched me in the face; they knocked my head around. I wouldn't be positive they punched me in the face; jerked me around; they slapped me once kin'ly hard. I didn't say my nose was swollen. it did swell up a little bit. My cheeks were swollen a little bit. My lips were kin'ly cut. They was bleeding a little bit inside. I was cut inside of my lips a little. The place where I was struck my lips were bleeding; they was kin'ly busted. I don't remember about whether my cheek was also cut on the inside. My whole face was swollen up and bruised, black and blue kin'ly. I didn't examine my back after I got to the jail at Scottsboro after the trouble. As far as my remembrance goes, I didn't find any blood on my back.

Q On the trial before judge Horton, did you testify-page 64 of the record before Judge Horton-were you asked these questions and did you make these answers: "Q. You lay on your back there for close to an hour on that jagged rock screaming? A. Yes sir."

Deposition from Ruby Bates

(Ruby Bates was not present for the trial of Clarence Norris so she submitted a written, swom deposition. The testimony shown in brackets was objected to by the prosecuting attorney.)

A After we returned from the doctor's office to the jail, there had been seven white boys arrested at Stevenson, Alabama, and had been transferred to Scottsboro. Lester Carter was also there at Scottsboro jail. [Victoria Price told the high sheriff, who was also the jailer, that one of these boys, who had been arrested and brought to this jail, was her half-brother.] Then she told again that she was attacked and raped by these negro boys. She told that to the sheriff. She said that there was twelve of these boys. There was not very much said about it that afternoon, because it was late and that night Victoria would not rest. I didn't know what was wrong. She was scared and we was both frightened. The next day we was examined again by the doctors and there was a few scratches on our bodies and there was a few bruised places. They was caused by the freight train riding [because anybody will get sore from riding in a freight train and staying in a hobo jungle. This boy, who Victoria claimed is her half-brother, also told that Victoria was his half-sister and kept making noise and kept trying to break out of the jail, until they put him in the same cell with Victoria Price and myself.] Then my mother appeared at the jail. First she asked the jailer why that man was in there with us two girls, and Victoria Price was standing there and she answered ["He is my half-brother." The jailer said he wouldn't be quiet until he was moved into the cell with Victoria.]. My mother tells the jailer that unless he removes that man from the cell she would see what she can do to him for having the man locked up in jail with two girls, when it was against the law. After the boy was removed, Victoria said to me that I must remember to tell the same story as she was telling me. She was at that time telling me what all she had told the sheriff. She had told the sheriff that we had been raped and she made up the story of how we had been raped, and she was telling me the story.... We were then removed on Sunday from the small cell to the large cell. There was also a cage in the middle of both cells where the men prisoners was, but there was more men prisoners in the larger cell. The seven white boys that were arrested was in this large cell. Victoria Price would have conversations with different ones of the boys that was arrested and placed in jail for witnesses against the negro boys. I do not know what the conversations was about, only in one conversation she had with one of the boys, the boy with whom she had claimed was her half-brother and with whom she had been making love affairs since she had been in jail, told her that he was going to tell the truth about it at the trial and that he was not going to lie for anybody, her or anyone else. I don't remember what he gave his name, but I remember that Texas was his nickname. I know his name now, Odell Gladwell. I also heard her tell Lester Carter that he must tell that we had been raped by these negro boys. ... Victoria Price reminded me during all this time that I must tell what she did. She said that unless I did tell what she did, I would get her in trouble. She would have to serve a jail sentence. [She was then expecting to be prosecuted by my mother for carrying me across the state line when I was under 21 years of age and because my mother knew nothing about my going from home.]

Left ArrowRight Arrow

Johnson, Claudia Durst. Understanding To Kill A Mockingbird. The Greenwood Publishing, Inc. Wesport, CT:©1994.

The Mockingbird | Historical Archives | The Scottsboro Trials