Message Boards
Home Search Feedback  

A.P.E. Message Board

 

From: Ilya Taytslin <ilyat@tmp.com>
Date: Tue Aug 19 13:44:59 1997
Subject: Re: Kennedy & Space Exploration
In reply to: Kennedy & Space Exploration


I partly agree. Considering the current financial straights of the Russian
Space Agency, you can not claim that Russia "won," but the US definitely
"lost". What is particularly annoying is that the loss was completely
avoidable.
The Moon race gave the US the technological base and the trained manpower to
establish permanent presence both in Earth orbit and on the Moon before 1980.
Both got squandered when NASA fundings were cut in early 70's.

The Moon race was undertaken at least in part because both US and USSR saw
Moon as a logical place to put ballistic missiles aimed at the other side.
In retrospect it seems silly, considering the expense of placing missiles
there, the travel time from Moon to Earth, and the impossibility of hiding
the launch. Hindsight is wonderful. In "Halfway to Anywhere," G. Harry Stine
says that Kennedy Administration should have concentrated on a
single-stage-to-orbit
rocketplane (X-15 flew in 1960, after all), and to let USSR waste its
efforts on the Moon. Right. Minor detail - someone in 1960 needed to look
into future and see Soviet Moon rocket (N-1) repeatedly blow up.
Replies to this post:

[ Reply to this message | Post a new message | Back to Threads ]
 

[ Home | Search | Feedback ]

A.P.E. - Message Board
Message Boards
Home Search Feedback  

A.P.E. Message Board

 

From: Ilya Taytslin <ilyat@tmp.com>
Date: Tue Aug 19 13:44:59 1997
Subject: Re: Kennedy & Space Exploration
In reply to: Kennedy & Space Exploration


I partly agree. Considering the current financial straights of the Russian
Space Agency, you can not claim that Russia "won," but the US definitely
"lost". What is particularly annoying is that the loss was completely
avoidable.
The Moon race gave the US the technological base and the trained manpower to
establish permanent presence both in Earth orbit and on the Moon before 1980.
Both got squandered when NASA fundings were cut in early 70's.

The Moon race was undertaken at least in part because both US and USSR saw
Moon as a logical place to put ballistic missiles aimed at the other side.
In retrospect it seems silly, considering the expense of placing missiles
there, the travel time from Moon to Earth, and the impossibility of hiding
the launch. Hindsight is wonderful. In "Halfway to Anywhere," G. Harry Stine
says that Kennedy Administration should have concentrated on a
single-stage-to-orbit
rocketplane (X-15 flew in 1960, after all), and to let USSR waste its
efforts on the Moon. Right. Minor detail - someone in 1960 needed to look
into future and see Soviet Moon rocket (N-1) repeatedly blow up.
Replies to this post:

[ Reply to this message | Post a new message | Back to Threads ]
 

[ Home | Search | Feedback ]