Sun
Home
Venus
Mercury is the closest planet to the Sun and the eighth largest. Mercury
is smaller in diameter than
Ganymede and Titan but more massive.
orbit: 57,910,000 km (0.38 AU) from Sun
diameter: 4,880 km
mass: 3.30e23 kg
In Roman mythology Mercury is the god of commerce, travel and thievery,
the Roman counterpart of
the Greek god Hermes, the messenger of the Gods. The planet probably received
this name because it
moves so quickly across the sky.
Mercury has been known since at least the time of the Sumerians (3rd millennium
BC). It was given
two names by the Greeks: Apollo for its apparition as a morning star and
Hermes as an evening star.
Greek astronomers knew, however, that the two names referred to the same
body. Heraclitus even
believed that Mercury and Venus orbit the Sun, not the Earth.
Mercury has been visited by only one spacecraft, Mariner 10. It flew by
three times in 1973 and
1974. Only 45% of the surface was mapped.
Mercury's orbit is highly eccentric; at perihelion it is only 46 million
km from the Sun but at
aphelion it is 70 million. The perihelion of its orbit precesses around
the Sun at a very slow rate.
19th century astronomers made very careful observations of Mercury's orbital
parameters but could
not adequately explain them using Newtonian mechanics. The tiny differences
between the observed
and predicted values were a minor but nagging problem for many decades.
It was thought that
another planet (sometimes called Vulcan) might exist in an orbit near Mercury's
to account for the
discrepancy. The real answer turned out to be much more dramatic: Einstein's
General Theory of
Relativity! Its correct prediction of the motions of Mercury was an important
factor in the early
acceptance of the theory.
Until 1962 it was thought that Mercury's "day" was the same length as its
"year" so as to keep that
same face to the Sun much as the Moon does to the Earth. But this was shown
to be false in 1965 by
doppler radar observations. It is now known that Mercury rotates three
times in two of its years.
Mercury is the only body in the solar system known to have an orbital/rotational
resonance with a
ratio other than 1:1.
This fact and the high eccentricity of Mercury's orbit would produce very
strange effects for an
observer on Mercury's surface. At some longitudes the observer would see
the Sun rise and then
gradually increase in apparent size as it slowly moved toward the zenith.
At that point the Sun would
stop, briefly reverse course, and stop again before resuming its path toward
the horizon and
decreasing in apparent size. All the while the stars would be moving three
times faster across the
sky. Observers at other points on Mercury's surface would
see different but equally bizarre
motions.
Temperature variations on Mercury are the most extreme in the solar system
ranging from 90 K to
700 K. The temperature on Venus is slightly hotter but very stable.
Mercury is in many ways similar to the Moon: its surface is heavily cratered
and very old; it has no
atmosphere; it exhibits no plate tectonics. On the other hand, Mercury
is much denser than the Moon
(5.43 gm/cm3 vs 3.34). Mercury is the second densest major body in the
solar system, after Earth.
Actually Earth's density is due in part to gravitational compression; if
not for this, Mercury would
be denser than Earth. This indicates that Mercury's dense iron core is
relatively larger than Earth's,
probably comprising the majority of the planet. Mercury therefore has only
a relatively thin silicate
mantle and crust.
Mercury's interior is dominated by a large iron core whose radius is 1800
to 1900 km. The silicate
outer shell (analogous to Earth's mantle and crust) is only 500 to 600
km thick. At least some of the
core is probably molten.
The surface of Mercury exhibits enormous escarpments, some up to hundreds
of kilometers in length
and as much as three kilometers high. Some cut through the rings of craters
and other features in such a
way as to indicate that they were formed by compression. It is estimated
that the surface area of
Mercury shrank by about 0.1% (or a decrease of about 1 km in the planet's
radius).
One of the largest features on Mercury's surface is the Caloris Basin (right);
it is about 1300 km in
diameter. It is thought to be similar to the large basins (maria) on the
Moon. Like the lunar basins, it
was probably caused by a very large impact early in the history of the
solar system. That impact was
probably also responsible for the odd terrain on the exact opposite side
of the planet.
In addition to the heavily cratered terrain, Mercury also has regions of
relatively smooth plains.
Some may be the result of ancient volcanic activity but some may be the
result of the deposition of
ejecta from cratering impacts.
A reanalysis of the Marriner data provides some preliminary evidence of
recent volcanism on
Mercury. But more data will be needed for confirmation.
Amazingly, radar observations of Mercury's north pole (a region not mapped
by Mariner 10) show
evidence of water ice in the protected shadows of some craters.
Mercury has a small magnetic field whose strength is about 1% of Earth's.
Mercury has no known satellites.
Mercury is often visible with binoculars or even the naked eye, but it
is always very near the Sun
and difficult to see in the twilight sky.
Mass (kg)
3.303e^23
Volume (1010 km3)
6.085
Equatorial radius (km)
2,439.7
Mean density (gm/cm^3)
5.42
Mean distance from Sun (AU)
0.387
Mean distance from the Sun (km)
57,910,000
Equatorial surface gravity (m/sec^2)
2.78
Equatorial escape velocity (m/sec)
4250
Polar radius (km)
2440
Volumetric mean radius (km)
2440
Escape velocity (m/sec)
.4300
Rotational period (days)
58.6462
Orbital period (days)
87.969
Mean orbital velocity (km/sec)
47.88
Orbital eccentricity
0.2056
Tilt of axis (degrees)
0.00
Orbital inclination (degrees)
7.004
Ellipticity
0.0000
Magnitude (Vo)
-1.9
Mean surface temperature
179°C
Maximum surface temperature
427°C
Minimum surface temperature
-173°C
GM (x 106 km3/s2)
0.02203
Bond albedo
0.056
Visual geometric albedo
0.11
Visual magnitude V(1,0)
-0.42
Solar irradiance (W/m2)
9214
Black-body temperature (K)
442.5
Moment of inertia (I/MR2)
0.33
J2 (x 10-6)
60.
Largest known surface feature
-Caloris Basin (1350 km diameter)
Atmospheric composition
Helium
42%
Sodium
42%
Oxygen
15%
Other
1%
| Mercury | |
|---|---|
| Semimajor axis (106 km) | 57.9 |
| Sidereal orbit period (days) | 87.969 |
| Tropical orbit period (days) | 87.968 |
| Perihelion (106 km) | 46.0 |
| Aphelion (106 km) | 69.8 |
| Synodic period (days) | 115.88 |
| Mean orbital velocity (km/s) | 47.89 |
| Orbit inclination (deg) | 7.00 |
| Orbit eccentricity | 0.2056 |
| Sidereal rotation period (hrs) | 1407.6 |
| Obliquity to orbit (deg) | ~0.1 |
Mercurian Magnetosphere
Dipole field strength: 0.0033 gauss-Rh3
Dipole tilt to rotational axis: 169 degrees
Longitude of tilt: 285 degrees (from Mercury I flyby)
115 degrees (from Mercury III flyby)
Note: Rh denotes Mercurian radii, 2,439 km
Mercurian Atmosphere
Surface Pressure: ~10-15 bar (0.001 picobar)
Average temperature: 440 K (590-725 K, sunward side)
Atmospheric composition: 98% Helium (He), 2% Hydrogen (H2)
Ice
on Mercury
Mercury would seem to be one of the least likely places in the solar system
to find ice. The
closest planet to the Sun has temperatures which can reach over 700 K.
The local day on the
surface of Mercury is 176 earth-days, so the surface is slowly rotating
under a relentless assault
from the Sun. Nonetheless, Earth-based radar imaging of Mercury has revealed
areas of high
radar reflectivity near the north and south poles, which could be indicative
of the presence of ice
in these regions (1-3). There appear to be dozens of these areas with generally
circular shapes.
Presumably, the ice is located within permanently shadowed craters near
the poles, where it may
be cold enough for ice to exist over long periods of time.
How was the evidence for ice found?
Investigations of Mercury were done from Earth using the Arecibo radio
telescope, the
Goldstone antenna, and the Very Large Array (VLA). The Goldstone/VLA study
(1) used the
NASA Deep Space Network 70-m Goldstone dish antenna to transmit 8.51 GHz,
460 kW, right
circularly polarized radar waves towards Mercury. The reflections were
received by the National
Radio Astronomy Observatories 26 VLA antennas. Calibration and processing
of the radar returns
showed radar-bright (high radar reflectivity) with depolarized signatures
at the north pole. The
Arecibo observations (2,3) were made by transmitting an S-band (2.4 GHz),
420-kW, circularly
polarized coded radar wave at Mercury. The wave reflects off Mercury back
to Earth. The wave is
both transmitted and received by the Arecibo radio telescope. Filtering
and processing the return
signal gives a radar reflectivity map of Mercury's surface with a resolution
of approximately 15 km.
About 20 anomalously reflective and highly depolarized features were observed
at the north
and south poles.
Why are these radar-bright areas thought to be ice?
Ice is highly radar reflective and the radar reflections off ice tend to
be highly depolarized, unlike
typical silicate rock which comprises the bulk of Mercury's surface. While
not as highly reflective
as other icy solar system objects, such as Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto,
these areas are still
significantly more reflective than silicate material. Moreover, the depolarized
nature of the
reflections is also an indicator of water ice. The Arecibo results show
that the radar reflective
areas are concentrated in crater-sized spots. At the south pole, the location
of the largest area
appears coincident with the large crater Chao Meng-Fu (shown at left)
and
the smaller areas with other identified craters. At the north
pole,
much of the area containing the
radar bright spots was
not
imaged, and so cannot be correlated with known
craters.
However,
for the imaged areas at both poles most
of the areas
have
been loosely correlated with known craters (3). Craters
near
the poles could provide the permanent, or near-permanent
(see
5), shading required for ice
to exist on Mercury. The radar
results
indicate the reflective areas are probably
relatively
uncontaminated
ice. However, the lower reflectivity compared
to
pure ice features indicates the ice may be
covered by a thin
layer of dust or soil or else does not completely cover the crater floor
(6).Note that no direct unequivocal
detection of ice has been made. The coincidence of the radar bright areas
with large, possibly permanently
shadowed, polar craters is strong circumstantial evidence for ice.
However, the radar reflections could be
explained by an enhancement of some other radar reflective
material, such as metal sulphides or other
metallic condensates, or precipitated sodium ions.
How can ice survive on Mercury?
As mentioned above, all provinces on Mercury are exposed to the Sun for
almost 90 earth-days at a
time, and can reach temperatures over 700 K. Additionally, Mercury has
no ambient atmosphere and
very low gravity. Water ice on the surface of Mercury is exposed directly
to vacuum, and will
rapidly sublime and escape into space unless it is kept cold at all times.
This implies that the ice can
never be exposed to direct sunlight. The only locations on the surface
of Mercury where this is
possible would seem to be near the poles, where the floors of some craters
might be deep enough to
afford permanent shading. Whether such permanently shadowed craters exist
on Mercury is still
problematic. The only close-up images we have of Mercury were taken by
the Mariner 10 spacecraft
on three close passes in 1974 and 1975. The same hemisphere of Mercury
was sunlit on each of these
passes, so nearly half the planet has never been imaged, and no determination
can be made of what
polar areas, if any, are permanently shadowed. However, theoretical studies
assuming typical crater
dimensions show that craters near the poles should have areas which never
rise above about 102 K (4)
and that even flat surfaces at the poles would not exceed about 167 K (5).
Other studies (6-7) also
indicate that water ice in polar craters on Mercury could be stable over
the age of the solar system.
How did the ice get there originally?
There are only two significant sources for ice on Mercury: meteorite bombardment
and planetary
outgassing. Meteorites, especially in the past, potentially carried large
amounts of water to
Mercury's surface. Outgassing of water from the planet's interior could
also provide a
non-negligible flux of water to the surface, although this is speculative.
The permanently shadowed
regions near Mercury's poles should act as "cold-traps" so that any water
which found its way to
these regions would freeze on the surface and remain. (The possibility
that the ice is relatively
uncontaminated may indicate that each deposit was laid down in one or a
small number of rapid events
(6), such as a large comet impact.) Meteorites which impacted near the
poles and water which
outgassed in that region could have been easily trapped. Water originating
away from the poles would
behave as individual, randomly moving molecules, some of which could migrate
to the poles and become
trapped there (6). There are mechanisms for potential loss of ice, however.
These include
photodissociation, solar wind sputtering, and micrometeoroid gardening.
The effects of these
processes are not well-understood.
How can this discovery be tested?
Direct observations of Mercury from Earth are difficult because Mercury
is so close to the Sun.
The only effective way to study the polar regions beyond radarobservations
is to send a space probe
equipped with an imager and spectrometry instruments. Missions to Mercury
are difficult because
the planet is deep in the Sun's gravitational well. No such mission is
currently planned. The only
mission to visit Mercury was Mariner 10 (shown at right) which had three
flybys in 1974
and 1975. Each of these flybys occurred when the same portion of the planet
was lit by the Sun, so
only about half the planet was imaged. By their very nature, the interiors
of shadowed craters are
too dark to image, so these pictures do not shed any light on whether or
not ice exists inside these
craters.
References
1) Mercury radar
imaging: Evidence for polar ice, Slade et al., Science, v. 258, p. 635,
1992
2) Radar mapping
of Mercury: Full-disk images and polar anomalies, Harmon and Slade, Science,
v. 258, p. 640, 1992
3) Radar mapping
of Mercury's polar anomalies, Harmon et al., Nature, v. 369, p. 213, 1994
4) Stability of
polar frosts in spherical bowl-shaped craters on the Moon, Mercury, and
Mars, Ingersoll et al., Icarus, v. 100, p.
40, 1992
5) The thermal stability
of water ice at the poles of Mercury, Paige et al., Science, v. 258, p.
643, 1992
6) Mercury: Full-disk
radar images and the detection and stability of ice at the north pole,
Butler et al., Journal of Geophysical
Research, v. 98,
p. 15,003, 1993
7) Near-surface
ice on Mercury and the Moon: A topographic thermal model, Salvail and Finale,
Icarus, v. 111, p. 441, 1994
Source of the Ice
on Mercury report:
Nine Planets by Bill
Amett - (see Source)








