|
nanotecnology |
| INTRODUCTION | TYPES OF NANO | WHERE NANO | WHY NANO | WHAT IS NANO |
| EFFECTS OF NANO | CURRENT RESEARCH | QUALIFICATION IN NANO | NANO IN MEDICAL | FUTURE NANO |
Types of Nanotechnology
In
this month's CRN
science essay, Chris Phoenix writes: When
the word "nanotechnology" was introduced to the public by Eric
Drexler's 1986 book Engines
of Creation, it meant something very specific: small
precise machines built out of molecules, which could build more molecular
machines and products — large, high-performance products. This goal or
aspect of nanotechnology now goes by several names, including molecular
nanotechnology, molecular manufacturing, and productive nanosystems. . . Molecular
manufacturing (MM) is a fairly mundane branch of nanotech, or it would be
if not for the political controversy that has swirled around it. The idea
is simple: Use nanoscale machines as construction tools, joining molecular
fragments into more machines. Every biological cell contains molecular
machines that do exactly that. There are, however, a few reasons why
molecular manufacturing has been highly controversial. To
those who study MM, its projected high performance indicates that
researchers should work toward this goal with a focused intensity not seen
since the Manhattan Project. To those who have not studied MM, talk of
motors a million times more powerful than today's merely seems fanciful, a
reason (or an excuse) to discount the entire field. At
least as problematic as the extreme technical claims are the concerns
about the extreme implications of molecular manufacturing. It is rare that
a technology comes along which revolutionizes society in a decade or so,
and even more rare that such things are correctly predicted in advance. It
is very tempting to dismiss claims of unstable arms races, wholesale
destruction of existing jobs, and widespread personal capacity for mass
destruction, as improbable. . . However,
all the skepticism in the world won't change the laws of physics. In more
than two decades (almost five, if you count from Richard
Feynman's visionary speech), no one has found a reason why MM
— even diamond-based MM — shouldn't work. In fact, the more work
that's done, the less complex it appears.
|
|
|
|
|