What will you envision the future of ThinkQuest to be?
That is the question from our team. We want to find out from past winners how they would like ThinkQuest to evolve into. So, thanks to some of their responses, you get the rare gem - views direct from the past winners of ThinkQuest!
Each response from each past winner of ThinkQuest is coupled with a podcast that contains our narration of their response plus explanation, elaboration and review of what they had said. If you want to save these into your computer or mp3 player, simply right-click each link and save the target/link to the desired destination.
Response #1
Kishore N C
Listen to podcast
I would definitely would like to see some sort of server side scripting functionality. By saying NO to server side technologies I think we are missing out on a lot of features that can be better used to give a more enriching experience. Although such a move can be a double edged sword, with valid security concerns, I still think that by restricting rights and core features, ThinkQuest can allow reasonable use of databases and server side technology.
I would like to see the inclusion of at least ONE overseas team member as mandatory for the teams competing in the competition. This certainly adds more challenge to the competition and would also make the experience much more valuable.
Finally I would like organizers to emphasize team to go for a more interactive form of learning, rather than filling the webpages with tonnes and tonnes of text.
Response #2
Sigit Adinugroho
Listen to podcast
I will not comment on the technical aspect e.g. the rules, the format of the competition or other things, because they will evolve by themselves as time changes. In my imagination, TQ in the future is so much about collaboration which will be enhanced in terms of getting more and more participants from places we never expected and new ways of communicating. The topics discussed will be more varied and focused, and will see innovation on the creation as web technology progresses. The length and quality of the entries will be enhanced, and I would see ThinkQuest Live changing places every year :)
Response #3
Ms Aileen Chor
Listen to podcast
I would like TQ participants to do more research based type of website, like the Avian Flu. This year I have a group working on assisting the handicapped to integrate into society. They cannot merely collect info from other websites or books. Instead they have to work with the handicap themselves and the organizations to understand their plight. Statistics are from the organization. Would like their website to arouse awareness than just pure info.
If they want to do more infomation-based website, like the Lung Cancer, that we'll be submitting, it must contain some interviews and surveys to to support their views.
The objectives of the survey were to find out the percentage of current or past ThinkQuesters who possess the necessary know-how of various web development technologies, namely XHTML, JavaScript, DOM, CSS and AJAX, and also their views on the aspects of ThinkQuest which can be improved.
By sampling past entries in the ThinkQuest library and from the survey responses, we observe that a significant proportion of ThinkQuesters do not know how to employ XHTML, DOM, CSS and AJAX. Comparatively, more are familiar with JavaScript and used it in their websites. This is understandable as the former are relatively new web technologies.
As these are technological trends which have been proven to enhance the quality of websites, we decided to focus our topic on these areas. We recommend all ThinkQuesters to have a working knowledge these technologies and utilize them for their website development.
There are many areas that ThinkQuest can possibly improve on. Most ThinkQuesters agree that two main areas – aesthetics and technical aspects are the most significant. ThinkQuest entries usually have a neat design, but it just lacks the "shining or standing beauty that will impress the audience", as what Juancheng has pointed out to us. Both aspects are inseparable as one will affect the visual appearance of the website, whereas the other will determine the ease of accessing and using the website.
Dr Amit Das, one of the coaches for ThinkQuest commented that:
"Content needs to be original, validated and interesting, (and) these requirements are not always met. Given that users of the ThinkQuest library are likely to trust the information they find there (more than random websites), the creators of content forThinkQuest sites carry a heavy responsibility."
The survey therefore explains the rationale of dividing our toolkit into four main sections: site content, design and graphics, use of interactivities, and technical issues (XHTML, CSS, Javascript and other interactivities).
Side note:
Due to time constraints, we only managed to contact 13 ThinkQuesters (including coaches and students) to help us out with the survey. We apologise to all our readers for this.
Qing Sheng
Listen to this podcast
Jun Ru
Listen to this podcast
Darryl
Listen to this podcast
Wei Chen (Jim)
Listen to this podcast
Many ThinkQuesters feel that ThinkQuest will evolve by itself in time to come, but look forward to the opening up of restrictions like server-side scripting. Most ThinkQuesters who had participated in multi-national teams before enjoyed the added experience of working with people outside their homeland, and felt that ThinkQuest should do more to increase such international collaboration between students.
A final say from Your TQ Guides: Every team has the potential to do well, so do your best. Remember to enjoy not only the product, but the process too!
The future of ThinkQuest is in your hands!