|
|
Introduction
International trade and poverty have always been related. Trade and foreign investment (called Foreign Direct Investment, or FDI) make up a large part of a country’s economy, which affects poverty within that country. But as Alan Winters, the Director of the World Bank Research Group, has noted, “Tracing the links between trade and poverty is going to be a detailed and frustrating task, for much of what one wishes to know is just unknown. It will also become obvious that most of the links are very case specific.”
Top
Trade and Poverty
Better trade practices have been shown to lift people out of poverty. Such has been the case especially in several East Asian countries – known as the Asian ‘Tigers’ – including China, Taiwan, and South Korea. Michael Moore, the World Trade Organization (WTO) Director-General, puts it well: “30 years ago, South Korea was as poor as Ghana. Today, thanks to trade-led growth, it is as rich as Portugal.”
The ‘Asian Tigers’ achieved their high economic growth because they agreed on much more open trade policies and started to welcome foreign investors. This allowed individuals and small businesses to reduce costs incurred from tariffs (or fees) and other trade-related expenses.
Tariffs
Tariffs have been a part of trade for millennia. In essence, they are taxes on imported goods that are collected before foreign imports can be distributed. While tariffs still exist around the world, they are barriers to truly open trade, where there are no tariffs.
Read More...
Tariffs are viewed as both good and bad. They are sometimes used to protect domestic companies from foreign competition. Cambodia, for example, produces textiles (used in clothing) for much less than textile manufacturers in the U.S. Tariffs and restrictions on foreign textiles, however, allow U.S. manufacturers to compete.
But tariffs can hurt consumers and foreign manufacturers. Consumers are forced to pay more for products, and foreign companies are forced to sell their products for much higher prices. In some cases, tariffs can spiral out of control, causing prices to skyrocket. Before 1789, for example, individual states in the U.S. regulated trade. Each time a product crossed a state border, its price went up. If a product needed to be transported from a southern state such as Florida to a northern state such as New York, a huge amount of the final retail price was simply the accumulated tariffs incurred from transportation. Due to the negative consequences of tariffs, the WTO regards tariffs as ‘bad,’ and advocates for decreasing them.
Collapse...
Frederick Erixon, a Swedish economist, believes that creating an open market for trade in developing countries is the only way to lift people out of poverty. He points out that at the same time that Eastern Asian countries were liberalizing, or opening up, their economies, many sub-Saharan African nations started to limit and shut down international trade. Not surprisingly, he argues, the East Asian countries did much better at alleviating poverty and growing economically than the African nations.
Studies by the WTO and World Bank, covering a combined total of 80 countries, also show that developing countries that engage in more open forms of trade are increasing their standard of living and economic performance.
Top
The Doha Round
The most recent development in trade and poverty is the so-called ‘Doha Round’ of WTO trade talks, a series of negotiations to discuss many trade issues in developing nations, most recently held in Hong Kong (this meeting was also known as the 'Sixth WTO Ministerial Conference'). The Doha Round started with a meeting of WTO members in Doha, Qatar, in 2001, and then proceeded to locations in Mexico (2003), Switzerland (2004), France (2005), and Hong Kong (2005).
|
|
The Doha Round of trade negotiations held by the WTO started with talks in Doha, Qatar.
|
The talks and negotiations are referred to the ‘Doha Round’ because of the ratification of the Doha Development Agenda there, which opens up trade in developing countries, especially in the agricultural sector, and is seen as a good way to cut poverty by allowing developing countries to compete in the global economy and improve the lives of their people. While short-term effects on poverty are expected to be mixed, studies suggest that the Doha Development Agenda should cut poverty in developing nations by up to 7% by 2015.
Although the ‘Doha Round’ has not been completed yet, it has made substantial progress in creating agreements between both rich and poor countries on complex trade issues, and should benefit poorer countries tremendously by allowing developing nations increased access to markets in developed nations. Though some minor issues on industrial and agricultural goods remain to be resolved, the Doah Round had been regarded by some as a success - it has resulted in increased trade opporunities for developing nations The Doha Round is expected to end sometime during 2006 or 2007, after several more trade talks are held.
Agricultural Subsidies in the Doha Round
One of the biggest issues faced by WTO trade negotiators at the Doha Round meetings has been agricultural subsidies.
Read More...
Many developing countries have very large agriculture industries (they are often the largest economic sector in the country, employing millions of people and accounting for much of the Gross Domestic Product of the nation). Industrialized countries, to protect their own farmers and agricultural sectors, however, often hand out subsidies that decrease costs for their own farmers. Subsidies are in effect government handouts or grants that lower costs faced by businesses, therefore lowering the price consumers have to pay for the eventual product. Developing nations accuse industrialized nations (especially those in the European Union and United States, which give out billions of dollars in agricultural subsidies, especially in the cotton market) of subsidizing agricultural goods so much that the goods can be exported to developing nations and sold at cheaper prices than local products, making local farmers unable to compete and sell their own goods. For example, cotton grown in the United States outsells African cotton, not because U.S. cotton is cheaper and better, but because the U.S. heavily subsidizes cotton farmers.
The Hong Kong meetings of the Doha Round, however, seem to spell the beginning of the end for agricultural subsidies - developed nations agreed to reduce subsidies immediately, and completely eliminate them by 2013. The World Bank estimates that these moves will increase the global economy by over $500 billion by 2015, and provide a broader market for farmers in developing nations.
Collapse...
Top
Sources
BBC News: 'Q&A: WTO trade breakthrough'
BBC News: 'Q&A: World trade in crisis.'
BBC News: 'Why Aid Doesn't Work'
BBC News: WTO Trade Agreement at a Glance
Business Journal: 'Textile industry wants trade-specific talks'
Schifferes, Steve.
BBC News: Final round for global trade deal. 21 December 2005
Wikipedia: Doha Round
Wikipedia: Tariff
Wikipedia: WTO MC6
World Bank: Evaluation of the Doha Development Agenda (PDF)
World Bank: Poverty and the WTO
WTO: 'Free trade helps reduce poverty, says new WTO secretariat study'
Top
|
Poverty Fact
|
|
This is a placeholder poverty fact.
|
|