Index
Methodology
Brief Report
Full Report
    Computer Usage
    Usage Frequency
    IT Accessibility
       eDivide Index
    Schoolwork
Visual Report
Discussions
Improvement
Acknowledgements
   
Print
Printer-Friendly Page
Allows you to open a less graphically intense version of the web page.
About
eBrochure
eTour
eSolutions
Our Project
FAQs
Site Map
References

Copyright Information
What are some factors that affect their computer usage frequency?
American results

By fitting the proportional odds model for computers usage frequency at home, we obtain the following odds ratio:

Variable Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval
Number of computers at home 1.873574 1.610324 2.179858
Home Internet connection
(0 = no, 1 = yes)
50.82075 28.88601 89.41174
Number of courses with at
least 1 assignment requires computer
1.207664 1.108726 1.31543
Consider IT important for future career
(3 = most important, 0 = not at all)
1.441165 1.233448 1.683862
Gender (0 = female, 1 = male) .7450006 .5854082 .9481007

These odds ratios can be interpreted as followed:

  • An increase in 1 computer at home increases the odds of the student using computers at home more frequentlyby 1.8 times.
  • Students with Internet connection at home are 50.8 times more likely to use computers at home than students without.
  • Students with 1 more course requires computer for at least one assignment are 1.2 times more likely to use computers at home
  • Students who consider IT important for future career 1-degree more are 1.4 times more likely to use computers at home
  • Male students are 25.5% less

Overall, physical factors such as number of computers at home and home Internet connection, as well as schooling and awareness factors determine the computer usage frequency at home of American students.

The oddsratios for frequency of computer usage at school can be interpreted similarly.

Variable Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval
Year of graduation 0.5872182 0.5417246 0.6365322
Gender 1.821334 1.535469 2.16042
Number of courses with at least
one assignment requires computer
1.414568 1.328547 1.506158
Consider IT important for future career 1.754853 1.564012 1.96898
Ability to access computers at school
(3 = never a problem, 0 = never available)
1.340151 1.18134 1.520313
  • Students who graduate one year later have a 41% lower odds of using computers at school more frequently
  • Males are 1.8 times more likely to use computers at school than females
  • Students with 1 more course requires computer for at least one assignment are 1.4 times more likely to use computers at school
  • Students who consider IT important for future career 1-degree more are 1.7 times more likely to use computers at school
  • Students who can access computers at school 1-degree more easily are 1.3 times more likely to use computers at school

Similar to the home-access results, computers usage frequency at Pinkerton Academy is affected by both physical access as well as awareness factors.

VN resultsBy fitting the proportional odds model for computers usage frequency at home, we obtain the following odds ratio:

Variable Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval
Number of computers at home 10.14106 3.63165 28.31804
Home Internet connection
(0 = no, 1 = yes)
3.193632 1.482194 6.881205
Number of courses with at least 1
assignment requires computer
1.506857 1.063428 2.135186

These odds ratios can be interpreted similar to the American results.

  • An increase in 1 computer at home increases the odds of the student using computers at home by 10.1 times.
  • Students with Internet connection at home are 3.2 times more likely to use computers at home than students without.
  • Students with 1 more course requires computer for at least one assignment are 1.5 times more likely to use computers at home

Compared to the American results, number of computers at home plays a much more important role in home computer usage frequency, while home Internet connection plays a lesser role. In contrast to the American results, awareness does not appear to be a significant factor that affects the computers usage frequency at home. This is expected as 100% Vietnamese students think that computers are important for their future career.

In contrast to the American results, awareness does not appear to be a significant factor that affects the computers usage frequency at home. This is expected as 100% Vietnamese students think that computers are important for their future career.

Below are the ratios for computers usage frequency at school:

Variable Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval
Year of graduation 25.28974 10.97104 58.29627
Computer usage frequency outside of school 0.4552899 0.2484155 0.8344444

These odds ratios can be interpreted as followed:

  • Students who graduate one year later are 25 times more likely to use computers at school more frequently
  • Students who use increase their frequency of computer usage outside school are 46% more likely to use computers at school less often than before

Students graduating in 2008 are more likely to use computers than those graduating in 2006. This can be explained partly by the fact that computer studies is a compulsory subject for 2008 students only. Also, 2006 students are preparing for the university entrance examination in July, and only a small portion of universities chose computer studies as one of the three exam subjects. This is further shown by the high correlation between accessibility to computers at school and year of graduation. (Pearson's correlation coefficient: r = 0.62). This also indicates that students at Kim Lien High School do not often use computers outside of computer studies classes.

The significance of the outside-school computer access factor indicates that students seem to prefer using computers outside than using computers at school.

All Vietnamese students think that computers are important for their future career. Therefore, awareness cannot help to explain the difference in computer usage frequency between the students.

Ability to access to computers at school does not appear as a significant factor since it has a high correlation with year of graduation.

 
Relationship between gender and computer usage frequency

The odds ratios above showed that girls tend to use computers at home more frequently than boys, while boys tend to use computers at school more frequently than girls. However, the overall use difference between boys and girls is not significant at the 95% level chi-square test of independence: x2 = 7.69, p = 0.053. There is no significant gender inequality in computer usage frequency in both schools.

 
 
 
 

Terms of Use | : 2005 – 2006 e-Divide Team. All rights reserved.