On the 17th August 1980, the Chamberlain
family was camping at Uluru in Australia's Northern Territory,
when at around eight o'clock at night, they heard a cry from
the tent where their ten week old baby girl and four year
old son were sleeping. Rushing to the tent, the mother of
the child, Lindy saw a dingo near the tent's entrance and
upon entering, realised with horror that her baby daughter
Azaria, was missing and all that remained was a pool of blood
on the floor. The police arrived and a search was organized
but no traces of the baby were found.
The Chamberlains were interviewed the next
morning and only some of the bloodstained items were removed
from the tent, with many being left behind. The family was
interviewed again later on that same day, by a different officer
who thought the Chamberlains' recounts of the previous night
were suspicious. A week passed and no new evidence was found,
that is, until a tourist found Azaria's vest and jumpsuit.
But despite this new piece of evidence, the crime scene was
not sealed off and a full examination of the clothing was
never conducted. This lack of proper crime scene and evidence
analysis led the police to believe that Lindy Chamberlain
was lying about her story. The lack of dingo bite marks and
saliva on Azaria's jumpsuit and the fact that the baby's shoes
were still tied inside the jumpsuit while the vest was inside
out, heightened the police's suspicion even further. In 1981,
it was however, concluded that Azaria was indeed taken by
a dingo, allowing Lindy and Michael Chamberlain to at last
get over the accusations after the tragic loss of their child
and move on with everyday life.
This was however, not to be the case, because
after a later analysis of the baby's clothing, it was found
that there was a bloody handprint in the shape of a women's
hand, reopening the case in 1982. Analysis of the Chamberlains'
car also revealed a pair of scissors, baby's blood and some
experts claimed that the rip marks on the baby's clothing
were actually scissor stab marks. And so it was with this
new evidence that another court case was held on the 2nd February,
1982. The case concluded for what was thought to be the last
time, when Lindy was convicted with murder of her daughter
and sentenced to life in prison. After serving six years in
prison, there was a turn in the case when baby Azaria's jacket
was unbelievably, found partly buried at Uluru. Just five
days later, Lindy was immediately released from prison, but
to this day, nobody knows the exact truth and we'll probably
never know.
In England, 1888, it was no longer safe to be walking the
streets of London's Whitechapel. A killer, given the nickname
of 'Jack the Ripper', was stalking and murdering prostitutes
in the area - five to begin with, between late August and
early November, 1888, but would eventually kill a total number
of seven women. 'Jack the Ripper' would murder the women,
before partially dissecting them and leaving their bodies
to be found by passing people. This case was the first case
that psychological profiling was used in an attempt to catch
a serial killer. A police surgeon by the name of George B.
Phillips first noticed that each of the murdered victims had
their organs removed with precision that could only be achieved
by someone with training in the medical or butchery industry.
Despite following these observations and the fact that the
police received several taunting notes signed 'Jack the Ripper',
the killer was never caught. Some notable suspects that later
investigations led to included Walter Sickert, an Impressionist
painter who released paintings of murdered prostitutes 20
years later, Robert Stephenson, the army surgeon/occultist/magician
and another man by the name of Thomas Cutbush. But to this
day, the identity of Jack remains a mystery.
One of the most destructive viruses ever created was known
as 'The Love Bug' and appeared in email inboxes with the subject
line - 'I Love You' just several years back. Created by a
Philippino man by the name of Onel de Guzman, 'The Love Bug'
attached itself to every contact in the computer's address
books and therefore was sent all over the world in a very
short period of time, spreading through a chain reaction.
Investigators were eventually able to trace the virus back
to its original creator through dissecting the virus and discovering
its code word, 'Barok'. At the time, Guzman was attending
AMACC, a computer college in the Philippines and it was one
of the professors that recognised the code word as being the
same one used in a program Guzman had created and submitted
as a term assignment. When police searched his apartment,
they discovered disks that proved he had helped create the
virus. At the time, May 2000, there was no law in the Philippines
against computer hacking, but by June, a new law had been
introduced, though by that stage, it was too late to apply
it to the 'Love Bug' case. The creator of the most destructive
virus in history got away with his crime completely unpunished.
In February 1997, a British policewoman, Shirley McKie, was
accused of perjury after testifying at a murder trial, stating
that she hadn't been in the murder victim's house, where her
fingerprints were later supposedly found. Shirley's house
was searched and she was taken back to the police station
where she herself was strip-searched and detained because
of a controversial fingerprint that was found at the victim's
house. The Scottish Criminal Records Office, responsible for
the detection of Shirley's thumbprint at the crime scene,
had 4 experts who certified the authenticity of the fingerprints
that they certified, definitely belonged to Shirley. However,
Shirley persisted her innocence with the matter and was acquitted
during her trial, saved from a potential 8 years imprisonment
after two American fingerprinting experts endorsed that the
fingerprint did not belong to Shirley. After much media activity,
legal action and controversy, Michael Russell, a member of
Scottish parliament, successfully requested different fingerprinting
experts from around the world to verify the ownership of this
fingerprint and have had to date, 171 certifications from
18 different countries that the fingerprint did not belong
to Shirley. The main concern with the entire issue was not
only its affect on Shirley's career, but also because it concerns
the accuracy of the Scottish Criminal Record Office's earlier
assertions. A civil trial, expected to be 5 weeks long, is
yet to be held on the 7th February 2006, almost ten years
after the beginnings of the perjury case. The death of Marion
Ross, the murder for which Shirley originally testified against,
remains however, yet a mystery.
On the night of the 12th of June 1994, Orenthal James Simpson's
ex-wife, Nicole and her friend, Ronald Goldman, were discovered
murdered at Nicole's Beverly Hills abode by her next door
neighbour. The police were notified and arrived immediately
at the horrific scene to find Nicole's severed body almost
decapitated and her friend's body, evidently fallen victim
to a hysterical stabbing attack. Upon further investigation
of the scene, a bloodstained left-hand glove was discovered
and her two sons were still inside the house, asleep in spite
of the night's events.
Homicide experts were called in and other officers made their
way to Simpson's house, a five minute drive away, where they
then discovered that he had taken a night flight to Chicago.
The police noticed blood all over Simpson's
car, which was parked outside the house. They also saw a trail
of blood drops leading from Simpson's car to the front door
of the house, where they discovered another bloodstained glove
identical to the one found near Nicole's body. Simpson was
contacted by police at his hotel in Chicago and although he
sounded distraught about his ex-wife's death, he didn't sound
curious to find out what happened. He caught the next plane
home and the police interviewed him on the same day. He had
a bandaged hand which he claimed was cut some time ago and
the wound had reopened when he accidentally cut it on some
glass. His hand was photographed, blood samples taken and
fingerprints recorded, then after all of this, he was free
to go. The search of his house was videotaped and by the afternoon
of the same day, all of the evidence needed was removed, recorded
and taken to a laboratory along with evidence taken from Simpson
himself.
Simpson was put on trial, one of the most highly publicised
trials in history, and all of the evidence seemed to point
to him being responsible for the murder. He had no alibi,
DNA analysis showed his blood was present on a sock found
in Nicole's room, both gloves were stained with blood from
both his victims and the trail of blood leading from the car
to his house seemed to heighten all suspicions. The case,
however, was turned around with Simpson's expert lawyers claiming
that a certain police officer present at the initial scene,
was racist against black people and that the officer had plenty
of time to 'set' the scene up while Simpson was in Chicago.
The recorded tape of the investigation of Simpson's house
also revealed a large number of mistakes such as unsterile
swabbing methods and unnoticed vital
clues. Because of these claims from Simpsons laywers, the
jury was convinced that Simpson was innocent and after a nine-month
trial, Simpson was cleared of murder charges and that was
that.
On the morning of the 27th December 1996, Patsy Ramsey called
the police to report her 5-year-old daughter, Jon Benet Ramsey,
missing. The little girl had disappeared from her bedroom
and a ransom note demanding one hundred and eighty thousand
dollars (exactly the amount John Ramsay, her father, had received
as a bonus at work just days before), had been left behind.
It was only hours later, that Mr Ramsey found his daughter's
strangled and battered body in the basement of their home
in Boulder, Colorado. Immediately after the accidental discovery
of Jon Benet's body, the parents fell under the suspicion
of the police, because a lack evidence was found that an intruder
had entered and killed the little girl. In fact, no proper
search was conducted when the Ramseys first reported the case
and friends were allowed to freely enter and leave the house.
The Ramseys hired an attorney, publicist and investigators
to defend their case, when they and their son, Burke (9 at
the time of Jon Benet's death), were interviewed by the police.
In separate rooms, all three members of the Ramsey family
were interviewed. After the interview, it was suspected that
Patsy Ramsey wrote the ransom note herself, as the note was
written from pen and paper found in Patsy's own writing corner.
The evidence found in the basement however, bore all the classic
signs of a murder by an intruder, including an open basement
window, an unidentified boot print outside the house, a hand
made strangling device and a possible sexual assault on the
child.
At the time, police were confident that the case would be
successfully solved using the DNA as evidence, but almost
nine years later, the police have still not solved the case,
no new leads have been found and none of the members of the
Ramsey family have admitted to the murder. To this day, police
are still attempting to find the person responsible for the
murder of Jon Benet and the case remains unsolved.
At the end of world war two, the plane carrying Hitler's
private archives crashed, apparently destroying the archives
for good. However, it was never proven that all the archives
were destroyed and that some may have miraculously survived.
It was this fact that lured Gerd Heidemann to purchase the
first volume of Hitler's diary from a man who claimed he acquired
them from an East German general trying to smuggle the scripts
over the border dividing the then, East and West Germany.
Heidemann's boss then offered to buy the volumes from him
for the equivalent of what would now be $3.7 million. The
diary entries were then published in a magazine and named
as a 'historic sensation', without even being checked for
authenticity.
Debates began to arise between historians all over the world
before the diaries were finally analysed for their validity.
Handwriting analysis and a careful examination of the paper,
ink and diaries itself were undertaken. After the investigation,
it was found that the diaries had to be forged, as some of
the entries were very close to a book, written in 1962, called
"Hitler's Speeches and Proclamations" and curiously,
the diary contained entries only for the dates in the book.
The labels on the diary, supposedly meant to have been typed
in 1943, were dated only to have been written 9 years earlier.
The diary's binding contained polyester threads which were
not first manufactured until 1953 and the paper also contained
a type of fluorescent brightener that was not introduced until
1954. The forger of the diary and Gerd Heidemann were both
sentenced to four and a half years in jail for their part
in the illegal creation of a diary to one of history's most
infamous figures, Adolf Hitler.